Chris Carbert, one of the four men charged in connection with the 2022 border blockade at Coutts, Alta., was denied bail at a hearing on Jan. 15. The four men have been in jail for 703 days under pre-trial detention.
It is the second time that Mr. Carbert’s request for bail has been denied, with the first request being denied in May 2022. The reasons for the judge’s decisions are protected by a publication ban, but the Crown previously indicated it planned to try the four men together.
Mr. Carbert, Christopher Lysak, Jerry Morin, and Anthony Olienick are accused of conspiring to kill police officers and were charged with conspiracy to commit murder in connection with the Coutts border blockade formed in solidarity with the Freedom Convoy protest against COVID-19 vaccine mandates and pandemic-related restrictions.
Shortly after the arrests, peaceful convoy demonstrators abandoned the Coutts protest site, saying they wanted to ensure they didn’t get associated with the alleged perpetrators.
The three other accused are set to stand trial from April 2 to April 19, 2024.
Legal Concerns
Some members of law enforcement and legal experts have raised concerns about the four men being denied bail, suggesting that the criminal case has been “politically influenced.” Donald Best, a former sergeant with the Toronto Police Service, told The Epoch Times that Canadians arrested for crimes like robbery and attempted murder are regularly given bail.James Kitchen, chief litigator for Liberty Coalition Canada, told The Epoch Times that bail should not be denied for any longer than “absolutely necessary” as it is “one of the worst violations of liberty, and it’s tyrannical to keep people for a long period of time without a really good reason.”
According to the Criminal Code, bail may be denied in cases where detention is necessary to ensure attendance in court or to protect public safety, “considering any substantial likelihood of reoffending upon release;” or is necessary to maintain confidence in the administration of justice, considering the “apparent strength of the prosecution’s case, the gravity of the offence, the circumstances surrounding its commission, and the potential for a lengthy prison term.”
The Alberta RCMP has told The Epoch Times they wouldn’t comment on the case as it is still before the courts.