Autism has become so overdiagnosed that in the coming years, it will grow more and more difficult to differentiate between people who have the disorder and people who don’t, a new study suggests.
Comparing the subjects of past studies with more recent ones revealed a significant difference: as time went on, the profiles of people diagnosed with autism became less and less different from the profiles of the general population.
“Autistic people we test now are less and less different than typical people—really less and less, to the point where if the trend continues, we won’t be able to find the least difference within five or 10 years,” Mottron said.
“Now you just have to be slightly diminished,” he added. “This paper confirms something everybody at the clinical level knows.”
According to the study, the trend could be due in part to changes over time to a broader definition of autism.
“The findings suggest that differences between individuals with autism and controls have decreased over time, which might be associated with changes in the definition of autism from a narrowly defined population toward an inclusive and heterogeneous population,” the authors wrote in their conclusion.
“This could have implications for our ability to build mechanistic models of the autism condition.”
The study goes on to list some possible causes of the changes, such as as the “evolution of diagnostic criteria,” which the authors said could have contributed to a more expansive understanding of autism. Another cause could be greater public awareness.
The authors analyzed data from a total of 27,723 individuals which, according to Mottron, encompasses “the whole of planetary research on the autistic brain.”
While Mottron noted that there may be large discrepancies between mild forms of autism and more serious ones, he said that usually, traits associated with autism don’t automatically point to the disorder as a whole, and that it’s crucial for doctors to put more work into understanding the finer details of each case before diagnosing someone.
Problems that could come about as a result of overdiagnosing, Mottron said, include the possibility of children receiving the wrong treatment as well as funding being reduced for the people who truly need it.
Canada’s 2018 federal budget set aside $20 million to help families of individuals diagnosed with autism. The money included funding toward informational networks, as well as community-based projects aimed toward strengthening educational programs around the disorder.
Mottron told the Canadian Press that part of the overdiagnosis problem can be attributed to schools, parents, and doctors—a child’s autism diagnosis gives the family “much greater chances” of receiving additional services from educational facilities like schools and daycares, even though “the need for services is independent from a diagnosis,” he explained.
“The problem is an ethical problem,” he said to CBC. “It’s unfair .… because currently being autistic brings more services than being an unidentified condition.”