American author and journalist Michael Shellenberger has weighed in on the dispute between X and Australia’s eSafety commissioner, warning the latter was attempting to “pursue global internet censorship.”
Mr. Shellenberger described American-born Julie Inman Grant as the “eSafety czar in Australia” and a “key architect” behind the multi-governmental Global Online Safety Regulators Network to “censor the speech that politicians and government bureaucrats fear.”
The global online safety network consists of seven members including representatives from Australia, France, the UK, Ireland, Korea, South Africa and Fiji. Ms. Grant previously said at a Senate Estimates hearing that the network aimed to “work together to achieve better safety outcomes for all of our citizens.”
In a post on X on April 24, Mr. Shellenberger described the network as a global body to “unify governments around censorship” and give “governments extraordinary power to invade privacy.”
“Inman Grant may be working with other governments to create identity requirements and to stamp out Virtual Private Networks, which millions of people in China and other totalitarian societies use to access the free Internet,” the American journalist wrote in his X post.
“Many of us, myself included, have long suspected that government censors in Ireland, Scotland, and the European Union would attempt to censor the whole of the Internet, not just in their own countries. With Brazil, and now Australia, demanding the power to censor the whole Internet, it’s clear that our fears were more than justified.”
The post also showed an interview of Ms. Grant on the All Tech Is Human channel, in which she said, “We have a big stick that we can use when we want to … They’re going to be regulated in ways that they don’t want to be regulated.”
She also pointed out that the biggest issues facing social media companies would be “the force of global governments regulating them in ways that might be both unworkable, inconsistent and detrimental to their future growth.”
