The federal Labor government has called for submissions to its public inquiry into the COVID-19 response.
These contributions will inform recommendations that “improve Australia’s preparedness for future pandemics.”
The call for submissions, published on the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet website, noted that submissions and evidence should be relevant to the inquiry’s terms of reference.
However, the requirement for submissions was “deliberately broad” to encourage a wide range of stakeholder views.
Some areas of interest include the response of health and non-health bodies, the responsibilities of the Commonwealth Government, the role of state and territory governments, and how the National Cabinet informed federal decisions.
The National Cabinet was formed on March 13, 2020, by then-Prime Minister Scott Morrison to make decisions on the COVID-19 response and comprised all the premiers and chief ministers of Australia.
Some contentious measures included a national lockdown, border closures, and a ban on leaving the country without a special exemption from the Department of Home Affairs.
State governments in their own right implemented some of the harshest lockdowns during COVID-19.
Sydney, in the state of New South Wales, also had a 107-day lockdown in 2021, in addition to a shorter lockdown in 2020.
Domestic border closures were also implemented by multiple state premiers in Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia, New South Wales, Victoria, and Tasmania.
Submissions Open Until Mid-December
The public has until Dec. 15 to provide submissions to the COVID-19 inquiry.The evidence will help the panel shape the next stage of the inquiry, a targeted stakeholder engagement in early 2o24 including roundtables and workshops.
“The panel welcomes published independent research and evidence-based findings, relevant to some or all of the terms of reference—either in support of a submission or on its own,” the inquiry website states.
“The panel also welcomes outlines of ongoing research, relevant to some or all of the terms of reference, including protocol, analyses, and findings to date.”
Concerns About Scope of Inquiry
In September, Australian Human Rights Commissioner Lorraine Finlay said an inquiry was inadequate to deal with the pandemic response and that a Royal Commission was the preferred option.Ms. Finlay raised concerns about the decision to exclude state and territory government decisions, noting that Australia as a federation needed to examine the actions of subnational governments.
“We need to ensure the rights and freedoms that were lost during the pandemic are better protected into the future and we need to ensure the human cost of the pandemic is properly understood so our emergency responses in the future don’t leave people or their rights behind.”
The federal opposition has also raised concerns, saying the inquiry appeared to be a “witch-hunt” against the previous government and that it was trying to avoid a clash with its state-level Labor counterparts.
“Light must be shone in on all of the decisions that were taken following the outbreak of COVID-19 in our country, particularly considering the significant role played by the states and territories, who were often responsible for decisions that most impacted on Australians lives and on their livelihoods,” the Coalition said.
“Actions like lockdowns, testing regimes, state border closures, and other restrictions that were placed on the Australian people, which we know are still having ongoing implications.”
Prior to the election, Mr. Albanese said it was “beyond doubt that you will need an assessment” when asked if he would set up a Royal Commission after the election.