The New South Wales (NSW) government is taking further action to improve bus seatbelt compliance following a tragic accident in the Hunter Valley in June.
The bus driver, Brett Andrew Button, faces 62 charges is remains before the courts.
New Safety Campaign on Seatbelt Compliance
A new safety campaign will be launched from the week ending Oct. 15 to educate passengers about the importance and legal requirements of wearing a seatbelt on a bus.It emphasises that using a seatbelt can double the chance of surviving a crash and reduce the risk of injury.
The campaign will be displayed on buses and coaches in the coming weeks, with a second campaign planned for the peak holiday travel period later this year.
“We want everyone to remember that seatbelts save lives. If there is a seatbelt available on the bus you’re travelling on, you must use it.”
Under current NSW laws, passengers on public service buses designed for standing use are not required to wear a seatbelt if no empty seat is available.
Concerns About Government Overregulation
The Hunter Valley bus accident has renewed debates on whether state and federal governments should introduce new seatbelt laws.While evidence suggests that seatbelt compliance can reduce casualty and injury risks in accidents, some political experts are concerned that the government could overstep its boundaries and interfere with people’s lives by introducing too many regulations.
“With a crisis comes the inevitable knee-jerk government response. It seems to be an affliction that is universal in Australia and most leaders nowadays, irrespective of the level of government or its stripes,” he wrote.
“The reaction is always more state interference in our lives and regulation; the view being the quicker the better because that is a display of ‘decisive leadership.’
“In so responding, the unsuspecting public is lured into the delusional belief that government can legislate and regulate us into a perfect society.”
Mr. Abetz cited several cases where the government’s interventions exacerbated the problems while promoting its “positive” images.
He then argued that there was a need for the government to reflect and consider whether to come up with a more minimalist response when facing a situation.
“Assisting the population to be self-reliant, dealing with the issues of the day without increasing taxes or government debt, avoiding regulations, and instead preserving personal freedoms would be a true display of decisive and principled leadership,” Mr. Abetz wrote.