Australia Risks Capital Flight as US Prepares for 15 Percent Corporate Tax Cut

Flags of Australia and U.S. adorn the Eisenhower Executive Office Building of the White House in Washington, on Oct. 21, 2023. Daniel Slim/AFP via Getty Images

Industry leaders say the U.S. Trump administration’s push to reduce its corporate tax rate to 15 percent, and impose tariffs on foreign imports, means Australia will need to work harder to compete globally.

President-elect Donald Trump has committed to slashing the U.S. corporate tax rate to 15 percent, following cuts in 2017 of the corporate rate from 35 to 21 percent.

The move is part of a broader package to revive U.S. competitiveness and has political leaders around the world watching closely.

Risks of Capital Flight From Australia

Federal Nationals member for New England, Barnaby Joyce, says that if the United States cuts its corporate tax rate, Australia would be “at risk of capital flight.”

“A substantially lower corporate tax rate in the U.S. is a substantially greater return on investment for shareholders. This would certainly draw capital away from Australia,” he told The Epoch Times.

Former Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce (and Nationals MP) speaking at CPAC conference in Sydney, Australia on Aug. 19, 2023. Wade Zhong/The Epoch Times

These concerns were echoed by the CEO of the Business Council of Australia, Bran Black.

He said Australia’s corporate tax rate stood at 30 percent, making it the third least competitive jurisdiction from a company tax perspective in the OECD, ahead of only Portugal and Colombia.

A more competitive tax rate, he said, could help attract investment, which in turn would create jobs.

“In 2017 when President Trump was first in office ... there was an immediate outflow of capital from Australia and other jurisdictions to the United States,” Black told ABC Radio National on Nov. 11.

“Indeed, we became a net exporter of capital to the United States, and we remained in that position for five consecutive years, for the first time since 1912. We don’t want to see that situation arise again.”

Just days after Trump won the election, one of Australia’s wealthiest individuals Anthony Pratt announced he would be permanently relocating to the United States for family reasons, and to manage his burgeoning business interests.

Pratt Industries is the fifth largest packaging and boxing firm in the United States.

US President Donald Trump (L), Global Chairman of Pratt/Visy Industries Anthony Pratt and former Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison (R) visit Pratt Industries during the plant's opening in Wapakoneta, Ohio on Sept. 22, 2019. Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

Saul Eslake, an independent economist, also said capital flight was likely, and that it would have an impact on productivity and employment.

“There would probably be renewed agitation for Australia to lower its company tax rate—although it’s important to note that doing so would result in Australian shareholders (both individuals and superannuation funds) paying higher personal income tax on dividends paid by Australian companies (because of our dividend imputation system), and the only beneficiaries would be foreign shareholders,” he told The Epoch Times.

Labor Minister Backs Corporate Tax Cut Idea

Industry Minister Ed Husic has long advocated for corporate tax reforms, arguing that tax cuts and investment allowances are crucial to stimulate capital and investment.

Despite Labor’s rejection in 2018 of the Turnbull government’s proposal to cut corporate tax rates, Husic believes opposition to such a move is waning.

“I think corporate tax reform and investment allowances must be considered to help unlock investment and capital,” Husic said at a conference earlier this year.

“The conversation about tax rates has to evolve as the economic environment changes.”

Back then when Treasurer Jim Chalmers was asked about Husic’s proposal he said it was “entirely consistent with the sorts of things that we have been saying for some time.”

Chalmers added, “I’m proud to work with Husic to incentivise production and investment in manufacturing.”

However, the Liberal-National Coalition criticised Labor’s lack of action on the issue, claiming the treasurer’s colleagues were “rolling over him.”

Global Tariffs and Impact on Australian Trade

In addition to tax cuts, Trump’s proposed tariffs—up to 60 percent on Chinese goods and up to 20 percent on imports from other countries—could further complicate Australia’s trade situation.

While higher U.S. tariffs could reduce competition, Eslake warned they might also increase inflation in the United States, affecting global trade.

“This will likely increase pressure on Australian businesses that export to the U.S. and could reduce demand for Australian minerals and energy commodities,” Eslake said.

“If other countries retaliate with similar tariffs, the consequences for Australia will be even worse.”

MP Joyce said Australia was highly dependent on trade.

“We are a trading nation who lives overwhelmingly on imported goods. We export raw materials and import manufactured goods,” Joyce said. “If you don’t export stuff, your currency is worth nothing.”

Meanwhile, the Business Council’s Black said if tariffs were universally applied to goods entering the U.S., it could affect demand for Australian-made products, which would, in turn, affect investment and jobs in Australia.

Despite these concerns, Treasurer Chalmers recently said the government was ready for any potential impact.

In a speech on Nov. 11, the treasurer said tariffs could reduce Australian exports and increase price pressures, but noted the country’s flexible exchange rate and independent central bank would help mitigate some of negative effects.

Yet tax advisor Kevin Beebe has said the move was aimed at reinvigorating the U.S. domestic economy, which had become heavily reliant on overseas imports.

“Tariffs encourage consumers to buy products made by U.S. workers, in U.S. factories, which translates into stronger demand, more jobs, and even potentially higher wages in manufacturing and other critical sectors,” he wrote on X.

“Imported electronics, vehicles, and certain consumer goods might get pricier, no sugar-coating it. But let’s think a bit longer-term: if tariffs boost domestic production, American companies have the opportunity (finally) to compete with foreign manufacturers.”

Daniel Y. Teng and Rex Widerstrom contributed to this article.