Prime Minister Scott Morrison has discussed the option of providing specialised humanitarian visas for Hong Kong residents if the situation worsens under the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) rule.
“But if the situation were to deteriorate, then the government is in a position to have people who are already here,” said Morrison.
Morrison also noted that the government has the option in dire circumstances, such as with the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989, to convert a visa into permanent residency.
“So we have all of those options still available to us, and we haven’t taken the decision to move to that level at this point,” the prime minister explained.
The introduction of new draconian national security laws to Hong Kong by the CCP prompted Australia to extend an easier path to permanent residency for some Hong Kong passport holders.
But the government stopped short of using its powers to create a particular round of humanitarian visas for people fleeing persecution in the Chinese territory at the moment.
Instead, they focused on the estimated 10,000 students and skilled visa holders who were currently living in Australia.
“And if people, no matter where they are, are genuinely facing persecution, they can apply for one of those humanitarian visas,” said Tudge.
Tudge then went on to say that the Morrison government’s second reason was that they deliberately wanted to target “serious talent which is in Hong Kong, and businesses which have their regional headquarters in Hong Kong.”
“We know that many people will be looking for opportunities to relocate elsewhere in the world. And we want to grab some of that talent for Australia because they come here, they generate businesses, they create jobs, they create wealth for Australians. So that’s the objective of what we outlined this week,” Tudge said.
Australia has also suspended its extradition treaty with Hong Kong after criticising the Chinese communist regime for implement the national security law, saying it undermined the “One Country, Two Systems” agreement, and represented a fundamental change of rules.
“The circumstances have changed,” Morrison said.
“They are now materially different from what was understood with the basic law and those declarations that were made at the time,” he said.