Business Groups Warn Labor’s Workplace Law Reforms ‘Deeply Flawed’

Business Groups Warn Labor’s Workplace Law Reforms ‘Deeply Flawed’
Construction workers are pictured at a building site in Melbourne's city centre in Melbourne, Australia, on Sep. 17, 2020. William West/AFP via Getty Images
Henry Jom
Updated:
0:00

Australian business groups have continued to push back against the Albanese government’s proposed workplace relations laws, saying the bill is “deeply flawed” and will impact sections of the economy.

It comes as the Labor government introduced the “Closing the Loopholes” Bill into Parliament on Sept. 4 by Employment Minister Tony Burke, who said it would improve working conditions for Australian workers.

Under the bill, a raft of workplace law changes will compel companies to pay labour-hire workers the same rates as full or part-time employees. The bill will also criminalise wage theft, change gig economy working conditions (Uber Eats and so on), create a pathway for casuals to become permanent, and end discrimination against survivors of domestic violence.

In a Sept. 4 statement, Innes Willox, CEO of the national employer association Ai Group, said it is crucial Parliament “properly scrutinises” the proposed bill and does not downplay the significance or impact of the proposal.

“The ‘same job same pay policy’ will make it harder for employers to get the workers they need,” Mr. Willox said.

“The measures amount to an unfair and unjustified attack on labour-hire employers as well as the businesses and workers that depend upon the sector.

“Crucially, the government hasn’t gone far enough in ensuring that a change that is directed at closing a ‘labour hire loophole’ isn’t able to be used by unions to challenge and interfere with a raft of other commercial arrangements between businesses that haven’t traditionally been considered ‘labour hire.’”

Opposition workplace relations spokesperson, Michaelia Cash, said Senate members would comb through the bill.

“If you were given 800 pages of complex legislation that was going to affect your business, would you not ask the government to actually give this chamber the opportunity to properly scrutinise it?” she told the upper house on Sept. 7.

Employment Minister Says It Will Be ‘Life Changing’

Minister for Workplace Relations Tony Burke has pitched the bill as “life-changing.”
“This year’s legislation is about closing the loopholes that undercut pay and conditions for workers,” Mr. Burke said.

“Most workers will be unaffected by what happens this year, but for those who are affected—this will be life-changing.”

Minister for Employment Tony Burke during the Industrial Relations Bill vote in the House of Representatives at Parliament House in Canberra, Dec. 2, 2022. (AAP Image/Mick Tsikas)
Minister for Employment Tony Burke during the Industrial Relations Bill vote in the House of Representatives at Parliament House in Canberra, Dec. 2, 2022. AAP Image/Mick Tsikas

Additionally, rideshare and food delivery drivers would receive an extra $400 million a year, but the government has warned that some of that cost would be passed on to customers and restaurants.

The proposed bill will also raise wages by $510 million annually, affecting about 67,000 workers, according to documents attached to the bill.

Bill Contains ‘Major Flaw,’ Says Law Professor

Employment law expert, Professor Andrew Stewart from the University of Adelaide, said under its current form, the bill could have a wider purview than being presented by the government.
“It’s not what the legislation says. In fact, the legislation, as I read it, says the exact opposite. It says specialist contracting services are covered but the commission will have the discretion to not make an order to cover them,” Mr. Stewart said, reported The Guardian. “I think something’s gone wrong with the drafting.”

The law professor said that a law firm, accounting firm, or IT company that provides specialist services to a workplace is “potentially covered,” but has recommended an amendment be made to fix the “flaw” during a Senate inquiry.

The Epoch Times has approached the employment minister’s office for comment.

New Union Rules Also Criticised

The professor was also critical of a new rule where one or two union members in a workplace could spark formal negotiations on behalf of all other workers.

“It means you might have a workplace where there are one or two union members but they now formally have the right to advocate on behalf of everyone in the workplace who is eligible to be a union member and the employer will have to give them reasonable facilities to do that,” Mr. Stewart said.

Secretary of the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU), Sally McManus, said worker representatives who were educated and supported to do their jobs were “essential to harmonious workplaces,” reported The Australian.

“If the people who volunteer to represent other workers understand their rights and obligations, issues can be resolved quickly in the workplace and we won’t see issues like wage theft going on for years unresolved,” Ms. McManus said.

Meanwhile, CEO of the Minerals Council of Australia, Tania Constable, described the Albanese government’s bill as “the most extreme, interventionist workplace [change]” ever proposed in Australia.

The proposed bill will now be subject to four weeks of debate.

Henry Jom
Henry Jom
Author
Henry Jom is a reporter for The Epoch Times, Australia, covering a range of topics, including medicolegal, health, political, and business-related issues. He has a background in the rehabilitation sciences and is currently completing a postgraduate degree in law. Henry can be contacted at [email protected]
twitter
Related Topics