Australian business groups have continued to push back against the Albanese government’s proposed workplace relations laws, saying the bill is “deeply flawed” and will impact sections of the economy.
It comes as the Labor government introduced the “Closing the Loopholes” Bill into Parliament on Sept. 4 by Employment Minister Tony Burke, who said it would improve working conditions for Australian workers.
Under the bill, a raft of workplace law changes will compel companies to pay labour-hire workers the same rates as full or part-time employees. The bill will also criminalise wage theft, change gig economy working conditions (Uber Eats and so on), create a pathway for casuals to become permanent, and end discrimination against survivors of domestic violence.
“The ‘same job same pay policy’ will make it harder for employers to get the workers they need,” Mr. Willox said.
“The measures amount to an unfair and unjustified attack on labour-hire employers as well as the businesses and workers that depend upon the sector.
“Crucially, the government hasn’t gone far enough in ensuring that a change that is directed at closing a ‘labour hire loophole’ isn’t able to be used by unions to challenge and interfere with a raft of other commercial arrangements between businesses that haven’t traditionally been considered ‘labour hire.’”
Opposition workplace relations spokesperson, Michaelia Cash, said Senate members would comb through the bill.
Employment Minister Says It Will Be ‘Life Changing’
Minister for Workplace Relations Tony Burke has pitched the bill as “life-changing.”“Most workers will be unaffected by what happens this year, but for those who are affected—this will be life-changing.”
Additionally, rideshare and food delivery drivers would receive an extra $400 million a year, but the government has warned that some of that cost would be passed on to customers and restaurants.
Bill Contains ‘Major Flaw,’ Says Law Professor
Employment law expert, Professor Andrew Stewart from the University of Adelaide, said under its current form, the bill could have a wider purview than being presented by the government.The law professor said that a law firm, accounting firm, or IT company that provides specialist services to a workplace is “potentially covered,” but has recommended an amendment be made to fix the “flaw” during a Senate inquiry.
New Union Rules Also Criticised
The professor was also critical of a new rule where one or two union members in a workplace could spark formal negotiations on behalf of all other workers.“It means you might have a workplace where there are one or two union members but they now formally have the right to advocate on behalf of everyone in the workplace who is eligible to be a union member and the employer will have to give them reasonable facilities to do that,” Mr. Stewart said.
“If the people who volunteer to represent other workers understand their rights and obligations, issues can be resolved quickly in the workplace and we won’t see issues like wage theft going on for years unresolved,” Ms. McManus said.
The proposed bill will now be subject to four weeks of debate.