The Oct. 30 deadline to relinquish banned firearms before their possession becomes a criminal offence is looming, but the ambiguous definition of what constitutes those weapons warrants an extended period of amnesty, says a non-governmental partner in the federal Firearms Buyback Program.
“There’s a current prohibition on the Canadian Criminal Code for these firearms and the only thing that exempts you from prosecution is the amnesty,” Canadian Sporting Arms and Ammunition Association (CSAAA) president Wes Winkel told The Epoch Times.
“They’re still building the parameters around it.”
The Liberal government, which worked with the CSAAA on the program, announced in 2020 it was adding over 1,500 firearms to the prohibited list and that it would buy them back from Canadians. Mr. Winkel says the situation is complicated by mismatched parts in different firearms.
He says this has thrown a wrench in the works and confused legislators who have yet to release salient details about which firearms are and aren’t legal, which could leave many unwitting gun owners in the lurch.
“What everyone doesn’t understand is that this category of firearms ... is rarely sold as an assembled unit,” Mr. Winkel said.
“The industry’s list of requests or demands is higher than what they initially thought it was going to be and they’re just been overwhelmed by the volume of product that’s out there in the country.”
The federal government, however, reiterated in April that its sights are set on a particular class of firearm.
Mr. Winkel is concerned that without some clarification, otherwise law-abiding individuals and companies could find themselves in legal jeopardy, he says.
“Businesses that are in a criminal situation don’t get approved for import permits and are not allowed to conduct business,” Mr. Winkel said.
The National Police Federation has questioned the potential efficacy of the program, stating it wouldn’t address criminal activity, gang crime, cross-border gun smuggling, or the general proliferation of illegal firearms.
However, gun control proponents point to mass shooting incidents in Canada as reason to restrict firearm ownership in the country.