According to the PBO, with the Senate amendments, the proposed carbon tax emption would save farmers up to $27 million a year by 2025-2026, a stark contrast from the $106 million annually that the original version of the carbon tax exemption Bill C-234 had promised.
The Senate amendments removed carbon tax exemptions for fuels used in heating or cooling buildings for livestock or crops and shortened the bill’s duration to there years from eight, ending in 2026 instead of 2030.
The farm fuel exemption has been central to Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s critique of the Liberal government’s carbon tax policy as he advocates for broader tax exemptions or the complete removal of the carbon tax to make farming and food more affordable for Canadians.
Conservative MP and shadow Agriculture Minister John Barlow emphasized during a Nov. 21 press conference before the march the significance of supporting Canadian farmers against the detrimental effects of the carbon tax under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government. Mr. Barlow highlighted the bill as a measure to mitigate the financial burden on farmers and reduce the cost of food for Canadians, explaining that it seeks to extend existing fuel exemptions to include cleaner burning fuels like natural gas and propane.
The legislation received backing from Conservative, NDP, Bloc Québécois, and Green Party MPs, along with some Liberals, and passed the House of Commons. However, its progress was stalled in the Senate due to amendments by senators that included limiting to three years, from eight, the extension of the carbon tax exemption for propane and natural gas used in agriculture.
Environment and Climate Change Minister Steven Guilbeault later said that he had held discussions with “half a dozen” senators to advise them that the government is opposed to the bill. He said it was “more of a conversation” rather than a “lobbying effort.”
The House of Commons initially passed the bill by 176 to 146. However, Mr. Poilievre has expressed concerns about whether the bill will be passed in the House with the Senate’s amendments or will require further deliberations between the two chambers.
Defending his government’s position, Mr. Guilbeault has said that “the price on pollution in the agricultural sector only applies to three percent of fuels that are being used, where alternative technologies are available.”