Virginia parents are raising concerns over what they feel are “extremely invasive” surveys being given to school students that promotes “early sexualization.”
“The Department of Health will be gathering information about the health risk behaviors of youth. The Virginia Youth Survey (VYS) has been developed to monitor priority health risk behaviors that contribute markedly to the leading causes of death, disability, and social problems among youth and adults within the Commonwealth of Virginia. The survey is administered every odd year in randomly selected Virginia public schools.”
Michael Leaser, director of external relations and community relations for The Family Foundation and resident of Fairfax County, Virginia, is concerned about the overreach of the survey and a similar one in Fairfax County.
“For us, one of the core areas is parental rights,” Leaser told The Epoch Times. “From our perspective, parents bear the ultimate primary responsibility for the children’s education. We, as parents, permit public schools to educate our children, but it’s ultimately our responsibility. Frankly, for some of these questions we’re concerned about them even being asked. We think they’re a little too personal.”
One question Leaser cited in the FCYS asked the child if their parents ever “threatened, bullied you or teased” them. “Those words have different implications,” Leaser said. He is also opposed to one question asking an eighth-grader if they’re transgender. “Some kids may not even quite understand that kind of question so I’m concerned as a parent,” Leaser said.
Cheryl Onderchain, a Loudoun County resident, chair for the Loudoun County chapter of Moms For Liberty, and parent of twin daughters in the Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS) system, is also troubled by the survey.
“Asking them about their gender, their feelings, and sexual questions like did you drink before having sex the last time? I mean, thanks for giving our teenagers ideas! There’s questions about drugs, drug use, probably drugs my kids don’t even know what they are. Questions about their weight. I mean, way to give teenage girls a complex about their weight. Crazy,” Onderchain told The Epoch Times.
“I don’t like it at all. I think it’s extremely invasive,” said Onderchain, adding that she has taken the step to opt her daughters out of taking the survey.
“I did a little research on it and it looks like the Virginia Department of Health got a five-year grant from the Center for Disease Control (CDC),“ Onderchain noted, ”and based on the CDC’s behavior over the last 20 months I don’t trust them as far as I can throw them.”
“I don’t know what the ulterior motives are,” Onderchain explained. “I don’t know why my children would be asked these types of questions. More importantly, what are they doing with this data? I don’t trust that this is an anonymous survey.”
Onderchain said students are told not to put their names on the survey “and there is no spot” provided for a child to write their name, but it is her understanding “the students are asked to put their student ID on it, which makes it identifiable information.”
Invasive Questioning
Questions on the high school survey (pdf) are more invasive and graphic, asking teen-aged children numerous questions about suicide, forced sex, drugs, and alcohol use by them and their parents. There are also innocuous questions like, do they eat green salads or drink fruit juice, followed by questions about their sexual preferences, how many sexual partners they’ve had, and did they drink alcohol or do drugs before sex.
“Why is that VDH’s business? I don’t need the Virginia Department of Health asking my kids such granular questions about sex and putting ideas in their head, asking them if they’ve ever had sex. Did they drink before having sex. How many sexual partners have they had. Have they ever had oral sex. I mean that’s appalling. My daughters are 15 years old. They’re still pretty innocent. I mean I don’t understand what this has to do with their schooling. I just don’t understand why these types of invasive questions would be asked and how it’s appropriate to administer a survey like this at school,” Onderchain added.
Cassandra, a Fairfax County mom who spoke to The Epoch Times under the condition of anonymity, was shocked by the specificity of the questions on the survey.
“It was shocking how specific they were,” she said, “like, ‘how many times in the last 30 days have you done cocaine? In the last year how many times have you done cocaine? In the last week how many times have you done cocaine?’ It was like beating the kids over the head with it and normalizing really odd behaviors you would not expect a really young child to be engaged in.”
A Nation of Illiterates
According to a recent study by the International Literacy Association, almost two-thirds of America’s fourth-graders read below grade level, with the same number graduating high school still reading below grade level. This puts America’s children far behind those in countries like Japan, Canada, the Republic of Korea, and the UK.Asked if she believes America’s illiteracy problem is a side effect of the education system’s transition from teaching to social engineering, Onderchain said “it absolutely is.”
“And I think that a lot of these initiatives that have the word ‘equity’ in the tile is to cover up for the massive failure of public education in this country,” Onerchain added, “and that is why these teachers unions are so politicizing what children are taught because they’re covering for their own failures.”
Maria Keffler of Arlington, Virginia, who has already pulled her children from the public school system, has also opted her children out of the survey.
Keffler, an author, speaker, and teacher with a background in educational psychology, is also a co-founder of Advocates Protecting Children, Partners for Ethical Care, and the Arlington Parent Coalition.
Teens Speak Out
The study, Teens Speak Out (pdf), commissioned by Ascend and conducted by the Barna Group and released in 2016, asked 18 and 19-year-olds nearing graduation or had already graduated high school a series of questions about sex and their thoughts regarding sex education classes.Among the key findings, nearly 30 percent of the teens surveyed said sex education classes made them feel like “sexual activity is an expectation.” This placed sex education in fifth place as a motivator to engage in sex, behind movies (60 percent), peers (55 percent), social or news media (51 percent), and music (40 percent).
“For students who received Sexual Risk Reduction (SRR) or ‘comprehensive sex’ education, said the pressure to have sex was even more intense, with nearly 40 percent saying that sex seemed expected,” Ascend President and CEO Mary Anne Mosack told The Epoch Times.
“What’s interesting is we found a lot of things really surprising in the survey, like why kids are waiting for sex,” said Mosack.
According to the study, the primary reason why some kids wait to have sex is they “are waiting for a committed relationship or because it’s not part of their personal values,” Mosack said. “We found that very interesting. The bottom two were ‘getting pregnant’ or ‘getting an STD,’ almost counter-intuitive to what we think right now.”
In addition, the study revealed that 21 percent of the male students said condom demonstrations made them feel more pressured to have sex.
Schools Should Teach—Not Indoctrinate
All of the parents who spoke to The Epoch Times on this matter reflected upon a time when schools taught subject matter such as reading, writing, math, and science. Now they see schools shifting more toward social engineering, usurping parental rights and pushing Critical Race Theory under the new monikers of Social Emotional Learning and Culturally Responsive Education.“This is a problem that has been getting more and more egregious through the decades taking more and more license in the culture that seems to embolden,” Mosack said. She described that some of the survey questions being asked now seek to identify trends and identify risk behaviors, but at the same time they are inappropriately introducing topics like oral and anal sex, transgenderism and gender fluidity, and the questions are asked in such a way that actually normalizes the behavior, especially for younger students.
According to Mosack, questions about sexual activity to a child create an expectation and can cause more confusion than clarity in the mind of a 10, 11, or 12-year-old.
“Themes and topics they have never even thought about in regards to their own sexuality can become very invasive,” Mosack explained, “so I think what parents are mainly objecting to is the type of questions that are actually inappropriate, and they’re inappropriate not only because of age but because they are suggesting normalization.”
According to Leaser, parents “outsource” the basics of a child’s education to schools, like reading, writing, and arithmetic. But when it comes to “core questions about sexuality and relationships,” Leaser believes these sensitive matters are should be reserved to a parent’s guidance and parents should “keep tabs on that and not outsource that to schools.
“We’re concerned that public schools are going into areas that are a parent’s purview,” Leaser explained. “As a parent, we have the ultimate responsibility for our kid’s education, but we permit the schools, we allow the schools to educate our children in certain areas.”
Onderchain added that “the last 20 months have been extremely eye-opening for me and for a lot of parents across the U.S. because when schools were shut down, parents had a chance to actually see what’s actually going on in their school system. We don’t like what we saw. I don’t like the politics being injected into my children’s education. The should go to school to learn math, science history how to write so they’re prepared for college. I’m so tired of our curriculum moving away from academic excellence and into indoctrination and talking about their feelings. They go to school to learn. At least they used to.”
