The case was dismissed by U.S. District Judge James Pederson on Thursday after all parties in the lawsuit agreed that federal law, not state law, takes precedence, essentially making the lawsuit moot.
Under Wisconsin state law, electors for president and vice president must meet on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December to cast their votes.
In its lawsuit, the Republican Party of Wisconsin said it has a vested interest in ensuring the votes of its assigned presidential electors are validly cast and will not be contested when Congress meets on Jan. 6, 2025, to count the Electoral College votes.
If the presidential electors do not follow federal law when they cast their votes, then those votes could be contested, the party said in the Dec. 6 complaint.
The party, which is tasked with organizing the voting meeting, could face criminal or civil penalties if it acts in contravention of either state or federal law, it said.
The state law requirement is therefore “unenforceable and void,” the party said.
The state Department of Justice and the Wisconsin Elections Commission agreed that the votes should be cast Tuesday, in accordance with federal law. The Justice Department asked that the case be dismissed.
The ECRA was passed in 2022 as part of efforts to modernize the outdated 1887 Electoral Count Act, which lawmakers said contained ambiguous provisions.
That compared to 1,668,229 votes for the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris and vice-presidential nominee Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz.
The Epoch Times contacted spokespersons for Evers, Kail, and Wolfe for comment but received no replies by publication time.