Wicker, Reed Urge Pentagon Watchdog to Investigate Signal Chat on Military Strike Planning

Senate Armed Services chair and ranking member issue bipartisan demand for Pentagon probe into Signal military chat.
Wicker, Reed Urge Pentagon Watchdog to Investigate Signal Chat on Military Strike Planning
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in Washington on Feb. 28, 2025. Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images
Tom Ozimek
Updated:
0:00

Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Ranking Member Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) have called on the Pentagon’s acting inspector general to investigate the circumstances surrounding a Signal group chat in which senior government officials discussed military strike plans.

In a March 26 letter to Acting Inspector General Steven Stebbins, the senators cited reporting by The Atlantic that its editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, had been inadvertently added to the encrypted chat, which included members of the National Security Council. The chat involved information related to military operations in Yemen.

“If true, this reporting raises questions as to the use of unclassified networks to discuss sensitive and classified information, as well as the sharing of such information with those who do not have proper clearance and need to know,” Wicker and Reed wrote.

The bipartisan letter requests an assessment of the facts and circumstances surrounding the Signal chat, including what was communicated and any remedial actions taken following its disclosure. The senators also ask for a review of Department of Defense (DOD) policies regarding the handling of sensitive and classified material on nongovernmental networks and whether those protocols were followed.

Wicker and Reed further urge the inspector general to examine whether any officials transferred classified information—including operational details—from secure systems to unclassified platforms, and, if so, how. They also request an evaluation of classification and declassification procedures, and whether relevant policies were adhered to. Finally, they seek a comparison of security policies across the White House, the DOD, the intelligence community, and other National Security Council agencies to determine if inconsistencies contributed to the potential breach.

The chat group, titled “Houthi PC small group,” included national security adviser Mike Waltz, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and other senior officials. Its existence became public after Goldberg’s phone number was inadvertently added to it two days before the U.S. launched renewed airstrikes against Iran-backed Houthi forces in Yemen.

According to Goldberg, the chat included messages about strike timing, weapon platforms such as F-18 fighter jets and MQ-9 Reaper drones, and other operational planning. He said one user—allegedly Hegseth—shared a specific timestamp for a drone strike.

While Trump administration officials maintain that no classified information was shared, the White House has launched an internal investigation into the inclusion of Goldberg in the chat group. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Wednesday that Goldberg had been “inadvertently added to the chat“ and the probe was being carried out ”to take responsibility and ensure this can never happen again.”

Waltz, who created the Signal group, told Fox News in an interview that he takes “full responsibility” for the leak. He said he had never met Goldberg and did not know how the journalist’s number was added.

President Donald Trump has defended Waltz, calling him “a good man” who “learned a lesson.” Trump suggested the incident likely stemmed from a technical glitch and said Signal may no longer be used going forward.

“We probably won’t be using it very much,” Trump said. “I don’t think it’s something we’re looking forward to using again.”

Separately, Senate Democrats have called on the Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate the matter. In a letter dated March 26, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and other Democratic lawmakers urged a DOJ probe into how Goldberg was added to the chat.

“We write to you with extreme alarm about the astonishingly poor judgment shown by your Cabinet and national security advisors,” they wrote.

The letter also warned that negligent disclosure of sensitive information “may constitute a criminal violation of the Espionage Act or other laws,” and urged Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate whether any officials unlawfully shared classified material.

The DOJ declined to comment.

The White House, along with Hegseth, Ratcliffe, and Gabbard, said that no “war plans” or classified content were disclosed in the chat. The Atlantic responded on Wednesday by publishing what it said were excerpts of the messages, in a report titled, “Here Are the Attack Plans That Trump’s Advisers Shared on Signal.”
Goldberg and co-author Shane Harris wrote that they released the messages because “people should see the texts in order to reach their own conclusions,” citing what they described as misleading statements by administration officials.

“There is a clear public interest in disclosing the sort of information that Trump advisers included in nonsecure communications channels,” the article stated.

Responding on social media, Leavitt said, “The Atlantic has conceded: these were NOT ‘war plans.’”
The DOD wrote, “They backpedaled the whole ‘war plans’ thing really, really fast.”
A spokesperson for the National Security Council told The Epoch Times that the conversation described by Goldberg “appears to be authentic.” Goldberg said he withheld certain details, including the name of a CIA employee, out of concern for national security.
Reuters contributed to this report.
Tom Ozimek
Tom Ozimek
Reporter
Tom Ozimek is a senior reporter for The Epoch Times. He has a broad background in journalism, deposit insurance, marketing and communications, and adult education.
twitter