The White House claims that President Joe Biden “absolutely did not apologize” for using the term “illegal” to refer to an immigrant during his State of the Union speech, despite President Biden expressing regret over his words in a later interview.
According to White House spokesperson Olivia Dalton, President Biden wasn’t in any way apologizing for using the term “illegal,” during that interview.
“He used a different word. I think what we should be really clear about is the facts,” Ms. Dalton added.
In the wake of President Biden’s speech and later MSNBC interview, multiple Republicans condemned him for what they saw as an apology to an alleged murderer and illegal immigrant.
Former President Trump, who was campaigning in Georgia at the time, criticized the president for the whole affair.
“Joe Biden went on television and apologized for calling Laken’s murderer an illegal,” he said. “Biden should be apologizing for apologizing to this killer.”
“The president is cowering to his base and showing deference to a man who deserves none,” Speaker Johnson said.
“This man is an illegal immigrant who brutally murdered Laken Riley. President Biden should be apologizing to Laken’s family. What an embarrassment.”
Ms. Dalton further doubled down on her claim that the president wasn’t apologizing and also claimed that another “fact” of the matter is the president had already addressed Ms. Riley’s family during his State of the Union Address, “when he spoke passionately about knowing what it means to lose a child and extended his deep grief and condolences to Laken Riley’s family in front of the entire country in the House Chamber.”
“And beyond that, I think it’s unconscionable that there are some people who are playing politics with this young woman’s tragic murder, and particularly at a time when, let’s not forget, House Republicans are standing in the way of a bipartisan border security agreement that is the toughest bill we have ever seen in history.”
The $118 billion package pairs tens of billions of dollars in wartime aid for Ukraine with new border laws aimed at shrinking the historic number of people who have crossed the U.S. border. The bill would also send military aid to Israel, fund other allies in the Asia-Pacific, and pay for humanitarian aid in Gaza.
Republicans opposing the bill argue that the border policy doesn’t go far enough and question additional aid for Ukraine.