“Providing a payroll tax deferral poses no risk to the Social Security Trust Fund and puts more money in the pockets of hardworking Americans as we fight to end this pandemic from China and rebuild our economy safely,” White House spokesman Judd Deere told The Epoch Times on Aug. 15.
“This has been a priority for President Trump and, while congressional Democrats played politics, the president acted for the forgotten men and women of this country, as he has done so many times before,” Deere said.
Most Senate Republicans and Trump support a $1 trillion package consisting solely of CCP virus relief aid, while Democrats want the relief aid, plus an additional $2 trillion for non-relief measures such as $1 trillion to bail out high-tax blue states that the president argues have been mismanaged for years.
Opposition
But Democrats and their allies in the special interest advocacy communities immediately branded the Trump proposal a dire threat to Social Security, prompting fears among millions of elderly Americans who depend on the program.Strong Economy Needed
The crux of the issue is whether the uncollected payroll tax revenues that would normally go into the Social Security Trust Fund in 2020 would be collected by Congress in 2021.A top Trump administration official, speaking on background, told The Epoch Times that “the president has called on Congress to make this deferral permanent. If they do not, this action still effectively allows working Americans to get a sizable advance on their pay starting in a month, which is just when working Americans need it most, as we are fighting to end the COVID-19 pandemic.”
Strong Support
Robert Carlstrom, president of AMAC Action, the advocacy wing of the Association of Mature American Citizens (AMAC), told The Epoch Times on Aug. 17 that a recent poll of the group’s membership found strong support for Trump’s actions.More than 26,000 of the responding AMAC members either said they strongly support Trump’s directive or agree with it as long as Social Security benefits weren’t subsequently made subject to the annual congressional budget process. More than 7,000 of the respondents were opposed or strongly opposed.
“The overwhelming majority agree with Trump, but there is a concern and that was reflected in the primary yes category,” Carlstrom said. The “primary yes category” consists of 16,000 of the 26,000 supporting Trump who said Social Security shouldn’t be part of the congressional budget process.
Even so, Grezler added, “it costs what it costs and whether it comes from the Social Security Trust Fund or general revenues, it still shifts a burden to future taxpayers and moves us closer to a financial crisis.”
Public Misunderstanding
The debate about Trump’s suspension and its potential impact on Social Security reflects a widespread public misunderstanding about how the program’s benefits are funded.The payroll tax is currently 12.4 percent on income taxable for Social Security, but the figure required to make the system solvent is 15.5 percent, Grezler said, citing the Social Security Trustees Report for 2020. The report estimates that the system will be unable to cover promised benefits by 2035 if no reforms are enacted.