Walz’s Wife Clarifies That Couple Used Different Treatment Than IVF

The Minnesota governor has said he wouldn’t have children if not for in vitro fertilization, or IVF.
Walz’s Wife Clarifies That Couple Used Different Treatment Than IVF
Minnesota Gov. and 2024 Democratic vice presidential candidate Tim Walz and his wife Gwen Walz in Chicago on Aug. 19, 2024. Charly Triballeau/AFP via Getty Images
Zachary Stieber
Updated:
0:00

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, who is on the Democratic Party ticket with Vice President Kamala Harris, was incorrect when he said he had children because of in vitro fertilization (IVF), his wife said.

Gwen Walz told news outlets in a statement that she and her husband used a different fertility procedure, intrauterine insemination, not IVF.

“Like so many who have experienced these challenges, we kept it largely to ourselves at the time—not even sharing the details with our wonderful and close family,” Gwen Walz said.

The only person who knew about the procedure, which involves using a catheter to place sperm in the uterus, was the couple’s next-door neighbor, a nurse who administered the treatments to Gwen Walz, according to the Minnesota governor’s wife.

Tim Walz, the Democratic Party’s vice presidential candidate, has said regularly that he and his wife have children as a result of IVF, which features taking an egg, putting it in a laboratory dish, and fertilizing it with sperm.

“Thank God for IVF, my wife and I have two beautiful children,” Walz said during a July appearance on MSNBC.

A spokesperson for the Harris–Walz campaign defended Walz’s past statements after Gwen Walz clarified the couple did not use IVF.

“Governor Walz talks how normal people talk. He was using commonly understood shorthand for fertility treatments,” the spokesperson said.

Tim Walz and his wife have two children, Hope and Gus.

The couple only started talking about their fertility treatment after the Alabama Supreme Court in February ruled that embryos kept outside the uterus are children and covered by state law, Gwen Walz said.

“After seeing the extreme attacks on reproductive health care across the country—particularly, the efforts in Alabama that jeopardized access to fertility treatments—Tim and I agreed that it was time to formally speak out about our experience,” she said.

The Alabama ruling prompted several clinics to stop providing IVF services over concerns they'd face criminal liability. Alabama legislators then in a bill signed by Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey shielded people who provide IVF services from any liability, and Alabama’s attorney general has said providers would not be prosecuted.
U.S. senators over the summer introduced several bills that would have helped maintain access to IVF in the states, but the bills were blocked by opposing parties. Republican vice presidential candidate Sen. J.D. Vance (R-Ohio) voted against one bill along with many other Republicans, while Democrats rejected the other measure.

Former President Donald Trump, who is running against Harris, has said that he strongly supports the use of IVF to conceive.

Zachary Stieber
Zachary Stieber
Senior Reporter
Zachary Stieber is a senior reporter for The Epoch Times based in Maryland. He covers U.S. and world news. Contact Zachary at [email protected]
twitter
truth