Washington state voters have rejected all but one of this year’s ballot initiatives, the one that preserves natural gas as an option for homes and businesses across the Evergreen State.
Under I-2066, state and local governments are banned from restricting access to natural gas for purposes such as heating homes and running kitchens in restaurants. It also prohibits the state building code council from discouraging or penalizing the use of natural gas in buildings
In addition, the measure bans the state’s utility regulatory agency from approving any rate plan that requires or incentivizes utility companies to terminate natural gas service or otherwise make it too expensive to afford.
The Building Industry Association of Washington (BIAW), the industry group championing the ballot initiative, celebrated the preliminary results as a win well before the official vote was called.
The law further requires PSE to stop offering rebates or incentives to customers for buying gas appliances starting from Jan. 1, 2025. Instead, the company must “educate its customers about the benefits of transitioning to electricity” and the availability of incentives for “energy-efficient electric appliances.”
Industry groups, including BIAW, have criticized the law for using what they consider misleading language.
The initiative is expected to go into effect next month.
The three rejected initiatives are I-2109, which would have repealed a 7 percent capital gains tax on the sale or exchange of stocks, bonds, and other assets valued above $250,000; I-2124, which would have allowed people to opt out of the state’s long-term care insurance program; and I-2117, which would have repealed the Climate Commitment Act, Gov. Jay Inslee’s signature law that makes Washington one of the only two states to require businesses to pay a carbon tax.
Inslee, a Democrat whose very brief 2020 presidential campaign almost entirely focused on climate-related initiatives, celebrated the defeat of I-2117.
“It can now look at Washington and have the message from this time and place that it’s a winning message to stand against climate change. This is a message that will spread throughout the United States. That’s why it’s so important that we don’t lose this initiative; otherwise, it could’ve dampened enthusiasm for climate change action.”