The 6-year-old boy who shot his first-grade teacher in January will not be charged, the city prosecutor in Newport News, Virginia, told NBC News on Wednesday, but he has not yet decided whether any adults associated with the case could be.
Though, in theory, a child that young could be arrested and criminally charged, Gwynn said, it’s uncertain whether he would have the competency to understand the legal system or even what a charge means, and he also would be unlikely to effectively assist an attorney in his defense.
Because the city prosecutor does not believe there is a “legal basis” to charge a child, Gwynn went on to tell the news outlet that his office is focusing on others.
“Our objective is not just to do something as quickly as possible,” he said. “Once we analyze the facts, we will charge any person or persons that we believe we can prove beyond a reasonable doubt committed a crime.”
He went on to describe the situation, where Zwerner was teaching in her classroom at Richneck Elementary School when the boy walked up to her, pointed the gun, and fired one round. Zwerner put up her hand in a “defensive position” when the gun went off, causing the bullet to go through her hand and into her upper chest.
“She suffered a gunshot wound, but she was able to get all of her students out of that classroom,” Drew said. “From the video surveillance we have of the hallway ... Mrs. Zwerner was the last person to leave that classroom.”
School Administrators’ Response
A potential lawsuit against the Newport News School District on the behalf of Zwerner is forthcoming, NBC reported. According to the victim’s attorney, the boy had a history of behavioral issues and “troubling interactions with school staff and other students.”Boy’s Parents Could Be Found at Fault
On Jan. 19, the boy’s parents released a statement through their attorney James Ellenson, where they said that their son “suffers from an acute disability” and was under a care plan at the school that called for one of his parents to accompany him to class every day.“The week of the shooting was the first week when we were not in class with him,” the statement said. “We will regret our absence on this day for the rest of our lives.”
The parents’ statement didn’t specify what kind of disability the boy suffered from, but when AP asked if it was intellectual or behavioral, Ellenson said, “all of the above.” He also mentioned that the decision for the parents to stop accompanying the boy to class “was a joint decision between the school and the parents.”
The statement also noted that the family “has always been committed to responsible gun ownership and keeping firearms out of the reach of children. The firearm our son accessed was secured.”
The statement didn’t explain how the gun was “secure,” but Ellenson told AP that the gun had been legally purchased, was secured with a trigger lock “that requires a key, similar to a bike lock,” and kept on the top shelf of the mother’s bedroom closet “that was well over six feet high.”
When AP asked how the child may have gotten access to the gun, Ellenson said, “We don’t know.”
However, the commonwealth does not have a law that requires unattended guns to be stored or locked in a particular way.