The United States is now granting citizenship to children born abroad through in vitro fertilization or other means of assisted reproductive technology, such as surrogacy.
President Joe Biden’s administration is changing the federal government’s interpretation of Section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which outlines the requirements for acquisition of U.S. citizenship at birth.
Previously, the government required children to have a biological connection to their U.S. parent to receive citizenship. Under the updated interpretation, the child may only have a biological connection to one parent, even if that parent isn’t a U.S. citizen.
“This updated interpretation and application of the INA takes into account the realities of modern families and advances in assisted reproductive technology (ART) unforeseen when the Act was enacted in 1952,” the State Department told The Epoch Times via email. “This change will allow an increased number of married couples, including those using ART, to transmit U.S. citizenship to their child born overseas, while continuing to follow the citizenship transmission requirements established in the INA.”
The requirement for a biological connection to a U.S. citizen remains in place for unmarried parents.
Immigration Equality, a group that works for equality for LGBTQ people, cheered the move.
“This is a remarkable moment for all the LGBTQ families who fought the U.S. State Department’s unconstitutional policy,” Immigration Equality Executive Director Aaron Morris said in a statement.
In recent years, several same-sex couples sued the U.S. government over the policy, including U.S. citizen Andrew Dvash-Banks and his husband Elad Dvash-Banks, who is a noncitizen.
The couple’s child was conceived using an egg from an anonymous donor and Elad’s sperm, meaning there was no biological connection to Dvash-Banks. The State Department determined that their child, E.J., was thus not granted citizenship upon birth in Canada.
Federal courts ruled against the State Department in that case, as well as in another similar matter. The State Department withdrew its appeal last year in one case and decided not to appeal the ruling in another.
Allison Blixt, a lesbian parent who filed a lawsuit against the government after it denied citizenship to her baby, called the updated interpretation of INA a success.
“We are relieved and thankful that our fight for our family to be recognized by the government has finally ended,” Blixt said in a statement.
Still, the new legal view could make it easier to commit fraud, according to some experts.
“This simply provides another wrinkle for the marriage fraud problem,” Jon Feere, director of investigations for the Center for Immigration Studies, told The Epoch Times. “In theory, it could have U.S. citizens offering to marry foreign nationals for a sum of cash and, in exchange, that foreign national adds a U.S. passport holder to their family.”
The State Department also acknowledged this possibility in a statement to The Epoch Times
“The department is keenly aware of the potential for fraudulent claims of citizenship or entitlement to immigration benefits. As with all citizenship and immigration benefits we examine, the Department implements this policy in a manner that addresses our fraud concerns,” the State Department said.
