Back in June, the widow of a man shot dead by police in a case of mistaken identity filed a $20 million civil lawsuit against the city, after the criminal case against officers was dropped by a jury.
Now lawyers for the city in Mississippi have filed to have that civil case dismissed with a controversial legal pitch: they claim the constitutional rights cited in the lawsuit do not apply because the victim was not in the country legally at the time of his death.
In July 2017, police in the city of Southaven mixed up the address of a man wanted for domestic assault with the address of Ismael Lopez. In the ensuing raid on Lopez’s mobile home, he was killed by a single bullet to the back of the head, fired through a closed door, according to court documents.
On Sept. 4, an attorney for the city filed to have that lawsuit dismissed saying that as an illegal alien, Lopez “had no Fourth or Fourteenth Amendment civil rights as alleged in the complaint.”
Lopez was a convicted felon for violent crime.
The attorney for the city cited two cases in which higher courts ruled that constitutional protections did not apply due to nationality.
The other case cited by the city’s attorney was a 2011 case about a Mexican man who had entered the country illegally and had pleaded guilty to being an illegal alien in 5th Circuit Appeals court rejected his claim that his Second Amendment rights had been violated.
“In an address to a federal judge in an open pleading in court, the city of Southaven has announced that it is their policy that if you are an undocumented resident of that city, you have no constitutional protections,” Wells said.
He said that the claims dispose of the right to constitutional protections, “meaning, that stormtroopers can come into your house and kill you without regard to any constitutional results or repercussions whatsoever,” Wells said, reported Local Memphis.
“If you take their arguments at face value, they can lock you up and throw away the key because you have no protections, no right to trial. They can kill you, they can use excessive force,” Wells said, “That’s what they are arguing. It’s just flat wrong. The Supreme Court has spoken to it over and over and over again.”
In the statement, he reiterated that the two officers were not indicted by a DeSoto grand jury and cleared by the FBI and Department of Justice.