Trump Hit With Six-Figure Legal Bill in Failed UK Lawsuit Over Steele Dossier

Former President Donald Trump may have to pay even more after a specialist judge determines a final bill at a later date.
Trump Hit With Six-Figure Legal Bill in Failed UK Lawsuit Over Steele Dossier
Republican presidential candidate, former President Donald Trump speaks in the library, at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Fla., on March 4, 2024. Alon Skuy/Getty Images
Tom Ozimek
Updated:
0:00

Former President Donald Trump faces a six-figure legal bill over a failed lawsuit stemming from the discredited research dossier authored by British ex-spy Christopher Steele, which played a key role in the FBI’s probe into the 2016 Trump campaign.

President Trump has been ordered to pay at least $382,000 in legal costs after losing the UK court case against Orbis Business Intelligence, a company founded by Mr. Steele, per a judicial order obtained by several British news outlets on March 7, including The Telegraph.

Judge Karen Steyn wrote in the order that President Trump must pay all of Orbis’ legal costs in the case. While the judge noted that the company has estimated its costs at over $767,000, she ordered the former president to pay about half that for now, with a specialist judge to determine a final bill at a later date.

The Epoch Times has reached out to President Trump’s spokesperson with a request for comment on the order and a query as to a potential appeal.

Case Dismissed

President Trump sued Orbis Business Intelligence in October 2023, seeking damages from the firm for allegedly violating British data protection laws in connection with the publication of the dossier authored by Mr. Steele, who was paid by Democrats to compile research that contained various salacious claims.

Hugh Tomlinson, the former president’s attorney, argued before the court that the dossier “contained shocking and scandalous claims about the personal conduct of President Trump,” including false allegations that he paid Russian officials to boost his economic interests.

Mr. Tomlinson also argued that the personal data linked to President Trump in Mr. Steele’s report—dubbed the Steele Dossier—is “egregiously inaccurate.”

President Trump said in a written witness statement that the claims in the dossier, which included salacious claims of sex parties in Moscow that Russian spies could use for blackmail, were “wholly untrue.”

Orbis attorneys have argued that the lawsuit should have been thrown out because the dossier was never meant to be made public and was published by BuzzFeed without Mr. Steele’s permission. They also argued that President Trump’s legal team filed their claim too late

Judge Steyn sided with Orbis, concluding that President Trump chose to allow many years to elapse without taking legal action to vindicate his reputation since the dossier was released in 2017.

“There are no compelling reasons to allow the claim to proceed to trial,” she said in court on Feb. 1 while ordering the case dismissed, per The Associated Press.

‘False and Defamatory Allegations’

After the judge ordered the case dismissed, Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung said in a statement that the former president would continue to fight to expose the inaccuracies in the dossier.
“The High Court in London has found that there was not even an attempt by Christopher Steele, or his group, to justify or try to prove, which they absolutely cannot, their false and defamatory allegations in the fake ‘dossier,’” Mr. Cheung said in the statement, which President Trump shared in a post on Truth Social.

“The High Court also found that there was processing, utilization, of those false statements. President Trump will continue to fight for the truth and against falsehoods such as ones promulgated by Steele and his cohorts,” Mr. Cheung added.

Some of the contents of the Steele Dossier formed part of the material that the FBI under the Obama administration used to obtain Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants to spy on former Trump campaign aide Carter Page.

Former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on April 16, 2018. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on April 16, 2018. Drew Angerer/Getty Images

This surveillance, in turn, formed part of the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation into President Trump’s 2016 election campaign and alleged Russian collusion.

In compiling the dossier, Mr. Steele was hired by opposition research firm Fusion GPS and funded by Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC).

Mr. Steele used second- and third-hand sources with ties to the Kremlin in putting together his report.

Even though the claims in the dossier were unverified and Mr. Steele’s prior remarks suggested an anti-Trump bias, the FBI and Department of Justice signed off on the FISA warrants.

The salacious claims in the dossier, which was leaked to the media, became part of the “Russian collusion” narrative that President Trump and others have dismissed as a ploy meant to attack and discredit him and undermine his administration.

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the “Russiagate” claims failed to verify any of the 100-plus key allegations in Mr. Steele’s discredited dossier.
Tom Ozimek
Tom Ozimek
Reporter
Tom Ozimek is a senior reporter for The Epoch Times. He has a broad background in journalism, deposit insurance, marketing and communications, and adult education.
twitter
Related Topics