“A Federal Judge is allowing the Nick Sandmann libel suit to move forward against the thoroughly disgusting Washington Post (which is no longer available at the White House!),” Trump said on Oct. 30.
“He could now have a good chance of winning. Go Nick!”
“The Court will adhere to its previous rulings as they pertain to these statements except Statements 10, 11, and 33, to the extent that these three statements state that plaintiff ‘blocked’ Nathan Phillips and ‘would not allow him to retreat,'" U.S. District Court Judge William Bertelsman said in his ruling this week about the statements claiming Sandmann was blocking Phillips.
“Suffice to say that the Court has given this matter careful review and concludes that ‘justice requires’ that discovery be had regarding these statements and their context. The Court will then consider them anew on summary judgment,” he added.
The paper also noted that it incorrectly said Phillips fought in the Vietnam War.
In its defense against Sandmann’s lawsuit, the paper has argued that the 33 statements outlined by Sandmann’s lawyers constituted opinion, not fact. Thirty of the statements do constitute opinion, Bertelsman ruled.
Trump has previously championed Sandmann, writing on Twitter on Feb. 20: “Covington student suing WAPO. Go get them Nick. Fake News!”
The other part of his statement on Wednesday referred to the White House halting subscriptions to the Washington Post and New York Times.
The White House press secretary also suggested that direct federal agencies will stop subscribing to the papers.
“Not renewing subscriptions across all federal agencies will be a significant cost saving for taxpayers—hundreds of thousands of dollars,” White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said in a statement about the decision.