Smith in his mammoth brief argued that while Trump was president at the time of the alleged crimes, the acts allegedly committed were not part of his job.
“Working with a team of private co-conspirators, the defendant acted as a candidate when he pursued multiple criminal means to disrupt, through fraud and deceit, the government function by which votes are collected and counted—a function in which the defendant, as president, had no official role,” the brief states.
Lawyers for the former president said in the new motion that Chutkan should also let them go up to 180 pages in their response to give Trump “an equal opportunity to submit and address facts bearing on immunity, and to rebut the special counsel’s misleading submissions.”
Smith was also granted additional weeks to complete the drafting of his brief, and Trump’s lawyers want a five-week extension to the current deadline to lodge a response. The current deadline is Oct. 17, and the new deadline would be Nov. 21.
“In total, the requested extension would provide President Trump 8 weeks to file his response, which approximates the 6 weeks the court granted the special counsel (including a 3-week extension before the status conference, and an additional 3 weeks thereafter to finalize its brief and exhibits),” the lawyers wrote. “Additionally, the extension reflects: (1) the enormous size of the Special Counsel’s filing, which will take substantial time to review, consider, and respond to, and (2) the importance of the issues at stake.”
The lawyers noted that no trial had been scheduled and that an extension would not prejudice the parties.
During a hearing on the matter, Chutkan had said that Trump’s lawyers could file for permission to file a surreply. In the filing, the lawyers said they want permission to lodge the surreply and proposed a deadline of Dec. 19.