Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger has called on House Speaker Kevin McCarthy to oppose a federal takeover of elections and support election law reforms.
The legislation is hotly disputed and contentious, with detractors claiming it is a blatant attempt to permanently slant elections in favor of Democrats and supporters claiming it will make voting more accessible and secure.
An opponent of H.R.1, Raffensperger proposed five measures he said would “strengthen the integrity of every election in America” and “reassure the public that our Congress is committed to ideals upon which our great nation was founded.”
Raffensperger called for an update to the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), also known as “Motor Voter,” and support for stronger maintenance of voting lists.
“According to the U.S. Census Bureau, over 7 million Americans move to a different state every year,” he wrote. “The 90-day blackout periods, and the onerous procedures to remove voters who no longer live in a state, allow voter lists to be more and more out of date.”
He noted that this was “especially true” in states that don’t prioritize “even following the low bar set for list maintenance in the current NVRA.”
Raffensperger said that improving list maintenance will improve election administration, lower costs, and enhance confidence in election outcomes.
Photo ID for Voters
The Georgia secretary of state also advocated for photo ID requirements in all modes of voting—which he noted 80 percent of Americans supported—a ban on “ballot harvesting” in federal elections, and risk-limiting audits performed in each state following a federal election.“Again, technology exists to make this easy,” he wrote. “Election research shows that Voter ID laws do not impact turnout, which is consistent with the record turnout Georgia experienced in 2022.”
He argued that signature matching as a form of voter verification was more subjective than photo IDs.
“Implementing a nationwide photo ID requirement would be a significant step in helping ensure the integrity of elections across the country,” he wrote.
‘Only American Citizens Can Vote’
Raffensperger lastly called for an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to state that only American citizens can vote in any American election. He argued that this would strengthen public trust and election integrity, and send a unifying message to American citizens whether born or naturalized.“Since 1996, federal law has required American citizenship as a prerequisite to voting in federal elections,” he wrote. “However as of 2022, 16 municipalities in the U.S. allowed noncitizens to vote in some or all local elections (two in California, 11 in Maryland, one in New York, and two in Vermont.)”
“Only four state constitutions explicitly require United States citizenship to vote in state and local elections,” he continued. “Yet across the country, some jurisdictions have either current permissions or existing proposals to loosen that requirement and make exceptions for non-citizen voting.”
Raffensperger emphasized that his proposed reforms are reasonable and common sense and that the implementation of similar laws in Georgia has made the state “a national model for a reasonable balance between election security and voter convenience.”
HR1
H.R.1 was introduced in 2019 and passed the House of Representatives in 2021, but it has not yet passed the U.S. Senate.Among its provisions, the bill would mandate automatic voter registration and same-day voter registration, early voting and voting by mail expansion, restrictions on voter ID laws, election security measures, and disclosure requirements for political spending.
Among its other items, H.R.1 would also make Election Day a federal holiday, assign redistricting responsibilities to independent commissions, and prohibit members of Congress from serving on corporate boards.
As a measure to increase voting access, states would also be required to offer early voting and online voter registration, and allow absentee ballots to be issued without requiring a reason for their request.
Further, a proposed amendment, that was ultimately rejected, proposed to reduce the voting age to 16 years old.