The Texas Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the state Legislature didn’t exceed its constitutional authority when creating the 15th Court of Appeals in 2023.
The appeals court, which is set to hear cases beginning on Sept. 1, will be located in Austin, Texas, and will have statewide jurisdiction over business court and civil cases in which any state department is a party.
The appeals court will not hear criminal cases.
Brown and Dallas County sought to keep the case in the Third Court of Appeals.
Dallas County had sued the Texas Health and Human Service Commission (HHSC) seeking a court order for the health commission to admit 300 inmates deemed incapable of standing trial—what the court calls “forensic commitments”—into its facility or for the HHSC to compensate the county for housing the inmates.
The HHSC said it couldn’t take the forensic commitments because it didn’t have beds.
The HHSC said the COVID pandemic only exacerbated the issue; however, the health commission has made steady progress toward “reducing the forensic commitment waitlist,” it said.
Because the case involves state officials, it was transferred to the new appellate court.
This transfer, however, will prolong Dallas County’s housing of these inmates, according to the county.
Among its arguments in the writ, the legal team for the county argued that the Legislature used language that strayed from the intent of the state constitution and exceeded the jurisdictional authority of the appeals court from geographical to statewide.
In addition, the legal team for the county argued that the process by which the new justices will be selected for the 15th Appeals Court is unconstitutional, because they will be appointed in September 2024, but they won’t be elected until November 2026.
The Texas Supreme Court found that the state constitution authorizes the Legislature to create courts, including ones that aren’t geographically limited, such as the 14 currently established.