The widespread blackouts across Texas serve as an early warning sign about the kind of destabilization that might occur if the country tries to move away from fossil fuels, according to a legal scholar.
The more the country tries to make wind and solar a primary power source, the more likely it is for mishaps to happen since renewable energy is generally less reliable, said Richard Epstein, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and a law professor at New York University Law School.
“It will have a huge destabilization because you get the greatest abundance in these [renewable] fuels often at a time when you need them the least,” Epstein told The Epoch Times. A wholesale displacement to an energy source which today produces 5 or 6 or 7 percent of the total capacity is just not in the cards.”
The Biden administration has often talked about increasing clean energy sources to combat climate change, one of its key agendas. Epstein said he regards this approach as “suicidal,” pointing out that system-wide vulnerabilities are much more common among renewable sources of energy.
“You cannot make your base an unstable source of energy,” he said. “It’s like you’re trying to lend money to somebody on a lottery ticket, which wins half the time, loses half the time, and half the time, you’re broke.”
“The more we make this stuff primary, the more dislocations we’re going to have,” he added. “It’s about keeping stable supplies under adverse conditions, and wind and solar cannot do that.”
Meanwhile, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has issued civil investigative demands to ERCOT and electric utility companies. His investigation will address power outages, emergency plans, energy pricing, and more storm-related issues.
Epstein said the Texas blackouts were “a bipartisan blunder,” adding that the state could have benefited from a stronger coal base.
It’s not just a question of whether running a windmill emits carbon dioxide, Epstein says, but more about building an effective system that can be proven to be kept running.