WASHINGTON—The U.S. Senate passed a sweeping tax bill, a significant milestone for Republicans in getting tax reform over the finish line. The Republican-controlled Senate passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act by a vote of 51-49 in the early hours of Saturday, Dec 2.
Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee was the only Republican who voted against the bill, citing concerns about the tax bill’s potential additions to the budget deficit.
Tax Reform gained momentum after Republican holdouts offered their support one after another. Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) announced his backing on Nov. 30. Other opponents Sens. Jeff Flake (R., Ariz.), Ron Johnson (R., Wis.), and Steve Daines (R. Mont.) also came on board hours before the vote, giving Republicans a sigh of relief.
All Democrats voted against the bill, arguing that the tax cuts benefit the rich over the middle-class and will swell the budget deficit over the next 10 years.
House Republican leaders have scheduled a vote for Dec. 4 to go to conference with the Senate on the tax bill. For tax reform to become law, both chambers have to pass the same legislation and send it to the president.
Republicans have an ambitious schedule to turn the bill into law by the end of the year. If they succeed, it will be the first major tax reform since 1986.
“Thank you to House and Senate Republicans for your hard work and commitment!”, he wrote.
Here is how the Senate bill compares to the House bill:
Both bills agree on reducing the corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 20 percent, which is the centerpiece of this tax reform. But the Senate’s tax cut would only take full effect in 2019.
Some are concerned that the delay would disappoint businesses, which would put off investment. According to some experts, however, this delay in the tax cut could indeed boost investments.
They believe the full expensing provision of the tax bill is more important than tax cuts. Full expensing would allow companies to immediately deduct 100 percent of the cost of capital investments from their tax bill. Businesses will have larger tax savings from writing off the costs of their investments at high tax rates and a year later will pay lower taxes on the payoffs from those investments.
The Senate bill differs significantly from the House bill on pass-through entities, like partnerships and limited liability companies that pay taxes on business profit as personal income. With its revised version, the Senate provides a better relief for pass-throughs.
Republican senators Daines and Johnson who earlier voiced concern over how pass-through entities were to be taxed, said yes to the Senate’s bill after securing further tax relief for these businesses.
The House bill, by contrast, caps the pass-through tax rate at 25 percent. It also sets anti-abuse rules that allow only 30 percent of a company’s revenue to be eligible for that rate and the other 70 percent to be treated as wage income subject to the individual tax rate.
To avoid individuals abusing the lower tax, both bills have guardrails, which include the exclusion of professional services. Many service providers such as consulting, law, and financial services companies cannot benefit from preferential treatment.
Both tax bills want to level the playing field between U.S. and foreign companies. So they both move from a worldwide taxation system—which taxes income earned anywhere in the world—to a territorial system, only taxing income earned inside the home country.
As a transition to the territorial system, there will be a one-time tax payable on profits U.S. multinationals have already accumulated overseas. The Senate bill proposes a rate of 14.5 percent (up from the 10 percent originally proposed) for liquid assets and 7.5 percent (versus 5 percent originally planned) for other assets. These rates are slightly higher than the House’s proposal.
The Senate bill keeps the seven individual tax brackets while the House bill condenses them for simplicity. The Senate bill reduces the rates on taxable income to:
10 percent (for incomes up to $9,525 for individuals; $19,050 for married couples filing jointly)
12 percent (for incomes between $9,525 and $38,700 for individuals; between $19,050 and $77,400 for couples)
22 percent (for incomes between $38,700 and $70,000 for individuals; between $77,400 and $140,000 for couples)
24 percent (for incomes between $70,000 and $160,000 for individuals; between $140,000 and $320,000 for couples)
32 percent (for incomes between $160,000 and $200,000 for individuals; between $320,000 and $400,000 for couples)
35 percent (for incomes between $200,000 and $500,000 for individuals; between $400,000 and $1 million for couples)
38.5 percent (for incomes over $500,000 for individuals; over $1 million for couples)
The House bill, by contrast, condenses the current seven tax brackets down to four: 12 percent, 25 percent, 35 percent, and 39.6 percent. And it increases income limits for each tax bracket.
In addition, both the Senate and House bills nearly double the standard deduction. In the Senate bill, the deduction increases from $6,350 to $12,000 for individuals and from $12,700 to $24,000 for married couples filing jointly.
The Senate bill repeals the deduction for SALT and allows deductions up to $10,000 for property taxes, in line with the House.
“The Senate tax bill will include my SALT amendment to allow taxpayers to deduct up to $10,000 for state and local property taxes,” she wrote in a tweet on Dec. 1.
Those who benefit from the SALT deductions are mostly taxpayers in high-tax states, and hence this provision drew a lot of criticism from states like New York, New Jersey, and California.
The Senate would keep the current rules that allow the deduction of mortgage interest for newly purchased homes up to $1 million. It eliminates the deduction for equity debt. Meanwhile, the House proposal caps the mortgage interest deduction to the first $500,000 in principal value.
In addition, the Senate would keep a number of popular tax credits and deductions that would be repealed by the House tax bill, including medical expenses, teacher expenses, and student loan interest.
The Senate bill increases the child tax credit from $1,000 to $2,000 per child. This is above the $1,600 proposed in the House bill.
The Senate proposal keeps the estate tax and doubles the threshold for the value of inheritance to $11.2 million.
The House bill, in contrast, increases the threshold to $10 million and eliminates it completely in six years’ time.
Senate Republican leaders decided on Nov. 14 to include the repeal of Obamacare’s individual mandate in the revised version of the bill. The individual mandate provision requires most Americans to have a basic level of health insurance coverage or else pay a tax penalty.
