Rohit Chopra, director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), on Saturday announced his departure from the agency, which has faced criticism from Republicans and others over claims of regulatory overreach, along with constitutional challenges to its existence.
“We’ve led efforts across the government to stop the scourge of junk fees in banking and across sectors of the economy, to tame the harmful impacts of medical bills riddled with errors, and to limit the creep of surveillance by data brokers that puts our sensitive data in the hands of foreign adversaries,” Chopra wrote.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for clarification on whether Chopra had been fired by Trump and whether the president plans to appoint an interim director before nominating Chopra’s replacement for the position, which is subject to Senate confirmation.
Since its inception in 2011, Republicans have viewed the CFPB as an overreaching and unaccountable agency. Chopra, a close ally of Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), was known for his aggressive regulatory agenda, which the next director is likely to review.
“Under Rohit Chopra’s leadership, the CFPB is holding Wall Street accountable for cheating hard-working families and preventing the de-banking of Americans across the country, including consumers locked out of the financial system due to overdraft fees, religious organizations, and conservatives,” Warren wrote.
Echoing the position expressed in Chopra’s letter that the CFPB’s mission aligns with some of Trump’s objectives, Warren warned against efforts to dismantle the agency.
“President Trump campaigned on capping credit card interest rates at 10 [percent] and lowering costs for Americans,” she wrote. “He needs a strong CFPB and a strong CFPB Director to do that. But if President Trump and Republicans decide to cower to Wall Street billionaires and destroy the agency, they will have a fight on their hands.”
Chopra’s departure comes amid long-standing legal and political battles over the CFPB’s authority, with critics targeting its leadership structure and its role in regulating the financial industry.