Lankford called the bill “misinformation” and said it was another effort “to inflame” and raise “the what-ifs.”
Dismissing those concerns, Lankford noted that there are thousands of bills filed in the Senate, “and how many of them are actually going to move?” he asked.
“Now, am I confident there are some people that are out there talking? Yes,” he said, going on to note that those measures would protect females being trafficked.
“So, while there’s conversation about how to put a piece of legislation out that may very well protect individuals that are being trafficked to go to other states to get an abortion or all kinds of other issues that are there,” he said, “I come back to the most basic thing—there is a child in this conversation, and maybe this body should pay attention to children as well, and to wonder what their future could be to travel in the days ahead as well.
Democrats’ Position
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) said that the bills and draft bills proposed by state legislators in certain states were “blatantly unconstitutional.”Democrats pointed to reports in the Washington Post that state lawmakers and conservative legal groups are “drafting legislation to ban travel for abortion.”
Although no law exists to ban travel for abortion, the Democratic senators sought to preemptively amend the law.
Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) echoed Masto’s sentiments, accusing Republican lawmakers of “ripping away the right to travel” for women.
“Let’s be really clear what that means: they want to hold women captive in their own states. They want to punish women—and anyone who might help them—for exercising their constitutional right to travel within our country to get the services they need in another state,” Murray said.
Masto and Murray introduced the proposed bill alongside Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), and a string of Democratic colleagues.