Reps. Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.) and Beth Van Duyne (R-Texas) shared their support of a bill that passed in the House on Jan. 9, dubbed the “Born Alive” act, which requires medical practitioners to provide medical care for babies born after an attempted abortion.
“The idea that we would have a child that would because of a botched abortion and be born alive, and then they would not receive proper medical care is soul-crushing and across America, there are all kinds of people who, even if they believe in abortion rights, they know that that baby is deserving of medical care,” Johnson told NTD News.
“That’s what the Republican House is going to say with a clear voice today that that is a human being that is worthy of protection and worthy of the appropriate medical care,” Johnson added.
Republicans Say Bill Gives Women a Voice
In addition to providing a standard of care to newborns that survive an abortion, the “Born Alive” bill also requires hospitals to report violations to law enforcement authorities, and penalizes the intentional killing of a born-alive child through fines or up to 5 years imprisonment.The bill also states that a mother of a newborn that survives an abortion may not be prosecuted under the bill. The legislation also creates a cause of action for the mother of an abortion survivor to sue an abortion provider.
“I think we’re trying to give women a voice,” Van Duyne said of the protections in the bill for mothers of newborns that survive an abortion.
“And if they do feel threatened in any way, they should be able to have a consequence, and have an ability to be able to go and seek protection and to seek support,” she added.
Johnson said the “Born Alive” bill is “not just a messaging bill.”
Abortion Group Calls Republican Measures ‘Extremist’
NARAL Pro-Choice America condemned the House votes to pass the “Born Alive” bill and the resolution condemning attacks on pro-life groups, calling the votes an “assault on abortion.”NARAL Pro-Choice America said the “Born Alive” bill would “interfere in personal family decisions” while the resolution condemning attacks on pro-life groups is “meant to muddy the waters and detract from the GOP’s extremely unpopular anti-reproductive freedom agenda.”
Johnson rejected the premise that the “Born Alive” bill represents an extreme restriction on abortion.
“Let’s remember the facts that we’re talking about here. A child has been born alive. Its heart is beating, its eyes are blinking. It has breath. It is there in a medical facility with medical professionals who can save its life. Taking care of that baby is not extreme. It is basic human dignity,” he said.
Rep. Beth Van Duyne (R-Texas) also argued against the idea that the “Born Alive” bill represents an extreme position, arguing instead that supporting abortion up to the moment of birth represents the more extreme position.
“Last Congress we saw the most extreme nature of Democrats, when you agree to the abortion of a baby up until the moment of birth, that’s extreme,” Van Duyne told NTD News ahead of the House vote. “What we’re saying is let’s set the expectations that we do support life, that we do value life.”
House Republican, South Carolina Rep. Nancy Mace, expressed some concern about the messaging of the bill before its passage.