As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic response that included lockdowns, many small businesses folded while big companies thrived, a senator said, calling this phenomenon a “wealth transfer.”
“There was nothing in the pandemic plan that called for shutdowns,” said Johnson, a Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs member, and the Budget and Finance Committee.
“The way we shut the economy down, we shut down all the little mom-and-pop shops, but we let the big box stores open.”
Revolving Door
Johnson called the government, Big Pharma, Big Tech, and legacy media the “COVID Cartel.” He said Big Pharma had captured federal health agencies, legacy media, and social media giants.“They controlled the narrative in a way that was highly beneficial to them,” Johnson said. He explained that companies like Amazon and social media did great during the pandemic because, due to the shutdown, people had to use social media and Big Tech.
Dr. Jordon Walker, director of R&D strategic operations and mRNA scientific planning at Pfizer, said in the video: “It [Pfizer] is a revolving door for all government officials.”
“As a regulator, you’re not going to really seriously regulate or question your future employer or your previous employer, who will be your future employer once again,” Johnson commented.
Tucker cited Milton Friedman, an economist and a recipient of the Nobel Prize, who warned that big business is the biggest enemy of capitalism.
Fear, a Population Control Tool
“Unfortunately, it’s very easy to manipulate a population, and the best way to manipulate them is with fear,” Johnson said.Johnson said that the technocrats and government health officials used fear to ensure that “the world was deathly afraid” of the COVID-19 pandemic. “As a result, when you’re deathly afraid, you’re looking for some relief from that fear.”
Then, health officials presented the vaccine as a cure for COVID-19, the senator explained.
When the COVID-19 pandemic hit, it was unknown what the potential fatality rate of the disease would be, Johnson said.
“Strategies focusing specifically on protecting high-risk elderly individuals should be considered in managing the pandemic,” the paper said.
Cover-Up
Johnson said he initially was not going to run for Senate in the 2022 midterm election after serving two terms in the upper chamber of Congress but changed his mind because no other lawmaker or congressional committee was conducting hearings on the COVID-19 response, vaccines, or vaccine injuries.Johnson added he was using his former chairmanship of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs to hold hearings and roundtable discussions to explore questions related to the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccines.
“The hearings I held should have been held in the health committees in both the House and the Senate, [but] they weren’t.”
“I got connected to the vaccine-injured community. Nobody was advocating for them,” Johnson said. “You can’t turn your back on people like that. All they wanted was to be seen, heard, and believed because they wanted to be cured.”
“I couldn’t turn my back on this country. This country is something rare and precious, Johnson continued. “ We’re a long way from perfect, but the people of America are good, as I think most people are around the world. The problem is really bad governance around the world.”
The senator also questioned restricting the free flow of information about the virus and the pandemic.
Response to COVID ‘a Miserable Failure’
Johnson wondered why early treatment was not pursued in response to the pandemic, calling this decision “insane.”“We didn’t look at all the different generic drugs that were on the shelf. They have been used for decades safely. They had the kind of properties that you’d be expecting in terms of being antiviral or anticoagulant or working with respiratory illnesses. We just threw all that aside.”
COVID tests cost the country tens of billions of dollars and created an opportunity for early disease detection, thus allowing for early treatment “which produces better results and better healing,” Johnson said. But “for whatever reason, there was a concerted effort not to promote or research or push any kind of early treatment, anything that might mitigate and lessen the severity of the disease.”
Johnson said that very early in the pandemic, he contacted Novartis, a hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) manufacturer, to find out if the company could make this inexpensive generic drug used by some doctors to treat COVID with promising results.
Johnson said the company was conducting clinical trials on hydroxychloroquine that were due in May or June 2020, but he stopped hearing from Novartis around mid-April.
“No safety issues have been reported, and there are no conclusions on efficacy from the study,” the statement said.
“It just seems like at some moment, pretty early on in the pandemic, the decision was made throughout the pharmaceutical industry, and throughout federal health agencies globally, that the solution was going to be a vaccine,” Johnson said, calling the response to COVID “a miserable failure.”
Dr. Harvey Risch, professor emeritus of epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health and Yale School of Medicine, said that early treatment of COVID with drugs like hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin could reduce the risk of hospitalization by 50 percent.
All the measures applied to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic were “plausible, but the scientific evidence is exactly opposite,” Risch stressed, referring to the paper.