New USPS Policies Could Delay Deliveries to Rural Areas

The proposal was made as the agency faces criticism from lawmakers for poor customer service.
New USPS Policies Could Delay Deliveries to Rural Areas
U.S. Postal Service mail vehicles in a file photograph. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
Naveen Athrappully
Updated:
0:00

The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) proposed a host of measures, aimed at saving the agency billions of dollars annually, that could increase delivery times in some regions of the country.

One of the proposals made by USPS is adjusting the pick-up and drop-off times of mail between post offices and processing plants when the offices are located far from regional hubs, according to an Aug. 22 statement. Another proposal could lead to faster delivery, with certain mail that used to take four days to deliver arriving in three days. However, certain regions could see slower deliveries, according to the USPS.

“Depending on location, time, and distance, expected time to deliver will increase for some ZIP code pairs,” it stated.

The proposed update would maintain the current one- to five-day service standards for First-Class Mail, the agency noted.

Under the proposal, people who live closer to the agency’s processing facilities could end up receiving their mail faster.

In contrast, those who live farther away, including in rural areas, could experience delayed mail delivery. Lawmakers had earlier raised concerns that slower mail in rural regions could negatively affect key services such as drug deliveries.

USPS has said that the changes will allow the agency to “operate more reliably.” The new policies will yield “significant cost reductions,” with the agency saving an estimated $3 billion annually.

“Since 1997, we’ve seen an 80-percent decline in Single-Piece First Class Mail volume,” Postmaster General Louis DeJoy said.

The 10-year “Delivering for America” plan, implemented in 2021, is transforming the network “to better reflect today’s market demands,” he said. The plan seeks to improve the financial and operational efficiency of the agency. USPS incurred more than $87 billion in losses between 2007 and 2020.

The American Postal Workers Union (APWU) criticized the proposal, stating that it is “deeply concerned” about these measures and accusing USPS of “once again planning to slow down much of the country’s mail.”

While the organization is open to implementing changes to ensure the long-term viability of the postal service, it stands against any strategy that includes slowing down and providing “overall worse service” to the people, according to the APWU.

“Management is already failing to meet the current first-class mail service standards even after lowering delivery targets in 2021,“ it stated. ”Rather than fix the service delays and problems, these new management proposals are to simply ‘move the goalposts.’”

USPS plans to hold a virtual conference in September to discuss its latest plans. It will file a formal request with the Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC) seeking an advisory opinion.

The agency stated that it would finalize a decision on the matter after receiving the PRC opinion. Any changes would come into effect after the November election and peak season, which runs from Thanksgiving through New Year’s Eve, it stated.

Service Quality

In April, a Senate committee hearing examined the operations of the USPS, during which time Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.) criticized the agency for declining customer service.

He said that in some communities, the changes to USPS’s processing and delivery network “have already disrupted or caused declines in service.”

“I remain concerned about these changes. There is no clear evidence that shows the changes will improve service in the long run,” the senator said. “The Postal Service has even said it must execute more changes before studying their impacts—essentially plowing ahead without knowing whether service could be harmed.”

DeJoy defended the agency’s actions during the hearing. He dismissed concerns about local communities being poorly serviced because mail processing will be conducted at faraway facilities, calling such notions a “misunderstanding.”

About 80 percent to 90 percent of the mail that originates in a specific city or county is usually sent to other parts of the state, country, or world, he noted.

“So making its first processing stop further away serves to hasten its travel, not slow it,“ he said. ”For the small percentage of mail that is local-to-local, it will continue to meet the two-day service standard.”

In May, a group of 26 bipartisan senators asked the USPS to halt the operational changes the agency has been implementing until the modifications are reviewed by the PRC.

The agency was moving too swiftly forward and making “irrevocable changes” that have resulted in negative user experiences for communities relying on the postal network, they said in a letter.

An issue it criticized is USPS’s plan to reduce the number of truck trips and mail collection at the postal agency’s facilities. This would result in mail sitting at local offices overnight.

“USPS has begun to implement this change without notifying the public, causing critical delays for mail that requires overnight delivery,” the senators wrote. “In some rural communities, it has eliminated the possibility of overnight delivery for critical mail like medications and laboratory tests.”

Reuters contributed to this article.
Naveen Athrappully
Naveen Athrappully
Author
Naveen Athrappully is a news reporter covering business and world events at The Epoch Times.