Navy SEAL Chief Eddie Gallagher, who faces allegations of war crimes during his deployment to Iraq, was moved to less restrictive detention and was able to meet with his family after President Donald Trump took an interest in his case, according to Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.).
He has pleaded not guilty. His lawyers have said he did not murder anyone and that disgruntled SEALs made the accusations because they wanted to get rid of a demanding platoon leader.
Hunter, who has advocated for better treatment of Gallagher, said he met with the decorated soldier on March 31 at the Marine Corps Air Base in San Diego.
“When I saw him, he was kind of out of it,“ Hunter added. ”Imagine being in a jail and being treated pretty harshly with a bunch of bad people, sex offender type of people, and now you’re out. He was just extremely happy to be out.”
A military judge last month postponed Gallagher’s trial by three months after defense lawyers asked for more time to go over the prosecution’s evidence. The trial was reset for May 28.
Lawmakers Voice Support
On March 18, Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas) and 17 other Republican members of the House sent a letter (pdf) to Navy Secretary Richard Spencer, raising concerns about the conditions of Gallagher’s confinement at the Navy brig in California.Crenshaw is a retired Navy SEAL who lost sight in his right eye after being hit by an improvised explosive in Afghanistan.
In the letter, the House members said Gallagher’s family and friends reported that he had not had sufficient access to his defense attorneys. They also said they got reports he was not receiving enough food or adequate medical care.
“Chief Gallagher is a decorated warfighter who, like all service members, is entitled to the presumption of innocence while awaiting court-martial,” the letter said.
“We therefore request that you review the underlying reasons for co-locating pretrial and post-trial confinees at Consolidated Brig Miramar and whether the current arrangement fundamentally disadvantages Chief Gallagher and other pre-trial service members. Furthermore, we request that you consider whether other locations are more appropriate for pretrial confinement,” read the letter.