Telsa and X owner Elon Musk’s decision to award registered voters in swing states a $1 million prize may land him in legal hot water, several professors and former federal officials say.
Previously, Musk and his PAC said that people have to sign the petition, be a registered voter, and reside in a swing state to be eligible to win the prize and made no mention of the job offer. In a recent town hall, the multibillionaire said that only registered voters can sign the petition and be eligible to win.
Two of the winners who Musk picked over the weekend appeared in promotional videos posted on the America PAC’s X account.
Musk announced another $1 million winner on Sunday evening, again urging people to sign his petition. According to his post, two Pennsylvania residents won after signing his American PAC’s petition “in support of the First and Second Amendments.”
What Is He Doing?
Musk made his initial promise of $1 million on Saturday before he awarded a check during an event that same day in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, to a man identified as John Dreher.His America PAC has launched a tour of Pennsylvania, a critical election battleground with just more than two weeks to go before the contest.
The PAC is also pushing to entice voters in other key states. It’s not the first offer of cash the organization has made. Musk has posted on X that he would offer people $47—and then $100—for referring others to register and sign the petition.
Professor Argues It’s Illegal
The move, however, has drawn its share of detractors.One of them, Rick Hasen, a professor at the University of California–Los Angeles, argued on his website that Musk has veered “into clearly illegal vote buying” with the prizes.
“Though maybe some of the other things Musk was doing were of murky legality, this one is clearly illegal,” Hasen wrote, citing a section of the U.S. Code on vote registration.
Others Say It Approaches Legal Barrier
Michael Kang, an election law professor at Northwestern University’s Pritzker School of Law, said the context of the giveaway so close to Election Day makes it harder to make the case that the effort is anything but incentivizing people to register to vote.“It’s not quite the same as paying someone to vote, but you’re getting close enough that we worry about its legality,” Kang said.
Brendan Fischer, a campaign finance lawyer, said the latest iteration of Musk’s giveaway may approach a legal boundary because Musk’s PAC is requiring voter registration as a requirement to be eligible to win.
Governor Wants Investigation
Speaking to NBC News’ “Meet the Press” on Sunday, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro said that law enforcement should “take a look” at Musk’s offer, which he described as “deeply concerning.”Musk Responds to Shapiro
Musk appeared to respond to Shapiro’s comment to “Meet the Press” on his social media platform, X, by reposting an article saying that the governor had met with Alexander Soros, the son of multibillionaire investor George Soros and who sits on the board of his father’s left-wing Open Society Foundations.The SpaceX CEO has not specifically responded to concerns raised by Hasen or other legal analysis about his swing-state giveaway.
In July, Musk announced he was endorsing Trump’s presidential campaign. Earlier this month, he appeared alongside the former president at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, where Trump survived an assassination attempt just three months prior.
Trump in turn has said that if he’s elected, he would appoint Musk to head a government efficiency panel.
The Epoch Times contacted a Musk company press account for comment but received no reply by publication time.