Beat reporters who need to focus on certain issues become wholly dependent upon their access to those in power, and they don’t want to jeopardize their relationships with those people, O’Keefe said. As a result, “they tend to play stenographer precisely when they should exercise independence,” he said.
“The only way that I found to not be so conflicted is to use hidden cameras and then use disguise,” the journalist said.
O’Keefe took the video to the FBI and other authorities, and as a result, three group members were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit an assault, the website said.
“Now, we don’t really have to do that anymore. People on the inside come out to be whistleblowers. ... I think the future is whistleblowing,” O’Keefe said.
Although most people might not want to speak the truth out of fear of repercussion, he thinks that a majority of individuals are very good people, including most people inside the Department of Justice.
What It Means to Be Muckraker
A muckraker has to “operate without fear or favor,” O’Keefe said.“The characteristic of an American muckraker is one who is so passionate about seeing the truth come to be ... that nothing is going to get in their way ... and anything that gets in [their] path is just a distraction,” whether it be a lawsuit or threat of jail, O’Keefe said.
A muckraker is passionate, committed, and never gives up, he said.
People might not want to speak the truth for fear of losing their Twitter account, or mainstream media doing a hit piece on them and then having an established narrative appear on their Wikipedia page that damages their reputation, the journalist said.
Media power to influence people is mostly “the power to shame and the power to humiliate,” and this power was given to them by Big Tech, O’Keefe said.
“The second option sounds like the more pleasurable option, but you'll only survive in a superficial bodily sense. And the only way we’re going to reverse the tide and save society from collapse is by creating a mass movement of these truth-tellers who give up their livelihood for the public’s right to know.
“In a world where now you have American reporters, my colleagues, being put in handcuffs, their home is raided for having been sent a document. In this world we find ourselves in, we have to create a way forward, we have to show people how to do it.”
“What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger,” O’Keefe said. “When you’re attacked the way that we are, and recently with the FBI raids—that’s one of the reasons why the source came to us with those Department of Defense documents, because it has engendered trust to those who come to you. And they share that pain with you and that trauma of being gaslit in their own institutions where they see how things are projected is so different than the way things really are.”
The response was “pretty poignant,” O’Keefe said. Murphy wrote in his response, “There are good people striving for the truth working together in and out of government, and they succeed.”
This statement “would indicate to me that there are more documents” that would corroborate the allegations, O’Keefe said.
“There are people on the inside who are good people, who are ethical people that took an oath. ... But a lot of people are struggling because they wrestle with this idea of betraying this institution which has betrayed them,” he said.
“These are the brave heroes, the anonymous everyday people that know what’s going on on the inside. [They] give up their livelihood and follow their conscience, because we all suffer in life in one way or another, but might as well do the right thing.
“The only way people are going to blow the whistle and speak truth is witnessing other people do it and following their lead.”
O’Keefe said a journalism professor criticized his undercover reporting methods as deception. His answer was: “What’s more important to you, deceiving your source or deceiving millions of people? ... If I have to choose between one of those, I'd rather deceive my source.”
“These are paradoxes in journalism,” O’Keefe said. “Some ethicists say a failure to deceive your source can sometimes be morally wrong when you know that source is lying to you.”