It was found that fetuses and unborn children do not fall under the definition of a child under the Child Protective Services Law (CPSL). Therefore, a woman cannot be declared a “perpetrator” for using drugs, even if the newborn suffers from birth defects after it is born.
Mother’s Relapses Lead to Withdrawal
The case involves a mother that was released from jail in 2016. After her release, she relapsed into drug abuse, using opioids, such as painkillers, and marijuana. She later learned she was pregnant and sought treatment for her addiction through a methadone maintenance project, and with subutex—but the treatment failed, and she relapsed again.She gave birth in 2017, and three days later the child started to experience neonatal withdrawal symptoms (NWS), such as tremors, excessive suck, increased muscle tone, and loose stools. This led to the newborn being treated for opioids.
Labels Will Not Prevent Further Harm
The Supreme Court found no evidence that suggests labeling the mother as a perpetrator of child abuse would protect future children from abuse.“Labeling a woman as a perpetrator of child abuse does not prevent her from becoming pregnant or provide any protection for a later conceived child while in utero,” states the hearing document. “It also does not ensure that the same woman will not use illegal drugs if she does again become pregnant.”
“As we argued, allowing people to be classified as child abusers under state law in response to alleged behavior while pregnant contradicts the clear legislative intent of the law.”
He then added that this would set a dangerous precedent wherein nearly any behavior while pregnant, like undergoing chemotherapy, would be considered child abuse.
In support of the family unit, the Supreme Court stated that labeling the mother a perpetrator of child abuse would lessen her time participating in the child’s life, as well as making it unlikely for the mother to get a job.