Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) failed in his first significant legislative test of 2019, on Jan. 8, coming up three votes short of the 60 needed to take up debate on Middle East policy proposals instead of Democratic bills to end the government shutdown.
The bill also includes military aid to Jordan and Israel, and supports additional sanctions against the Syrian regime of President Bashar al-Assad.
Democrats voting for the cloture motion included Sens. Robert Menendez of New Jersey, Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Doug Jones of Alabama, and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona.
Democrats, led by Sens. Chris Van Hollen and Ben Cardin of Maryland, argued over the weekend that senators should vote first on a measure approved by the House last week to reopen the government.
With more than 130,000 federal workers and multiple department and agency offices located there, Maryland is among the states most affected by the shutdown.
McConnell insists there won’t be a vote on reopening the government, however, without firm assurances that President Donald Trump will sign it. Trump won’t sign the House bill because it doesn’t fund construction of the wall on the southern border.
Earlier on Jan. 8, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) told senators he doubted there would be 60 votes on the cloture motion and expressed bewilderment that the Senate isn’t dealing with any of the “urgent issues” the country faces, despite the shutdown that began Dec. 22, 2018, and enters its 19th day on Jan. 9.
Debate on Anti-BDS Provision
The Democrats’ strategy for forcing a Senate vote on funding the government also ran into an unexpected obstacle earlier this week, when Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) put the anti-BDS provision in S.1 at the center of the debate instead of the government shutdown.“They forgot what country they represent. This is the U.S. where boycotting is a right & part of our historical fight for freedom & equality. Maybe a refresher on our U.S. Constitution is in order, then get back to opening up our government instead of taking our rights away.”
While spokesmen for Sanders and Cardin didn’t respond to a request for comment, a Senate Democratic aide, who asked not to be identified, said the BDS provision was irrelevant to the shutdown issue.
And a Van Hollen spokesman pointed to his tweet and that of Cardin in responding to Rubio.
Cardin was one of the initial authors and among eight Democrats who last year co-sponsored the anti-BDS provision now in S.1.
None of the Democrats approached Jan. 8 by The Epoch Times would discuss Rubio’s claim about a contentious BDS debate in their caucus.