A 46-year-old man was convicted on May 25 of killing his lover’s husband in Westminster nine years ago so the couple could be together and cash in on the victim’s assets.
Robert Rafael Saavedra Gallardo was convicted of murder with a special-circumstance allegation of murder for financial gain. Jurors deliberated for about 90 minutes before reaching the verdict.
Mr. Saavedra, who is scheduled to be sentenced on Aug. 11, is facing life in prison without the possibility of parole. Co-defendant Olga Vasquez-Collazos, 46, was convicted two years ago and sentenced to 25 years to life in prison. Jurors in that case rejected the special circumstance allegation.
Mr. Saavedra was convicted of killing 58-year-old Adrian Zapata, whose body was found in his apartment in the 15100 block of Brookhurst Street at about 10:35 a.m. May 22, 2014.
Mr. Saavedra and Ms. Vasquez-Collazos met in Peru and dated, but Ms. Vasquez-Collazos later got married to Zapata, who met her while he was vacationing in Peru, according to Senior Deputy District Attorney Janine Madera. Zapata, who had emigrated to the United States and became a citizen, married Ms. Vasquez-Collazos on Sept. 10, 2011.
Zapata arranged to have his wife and her two sons come live with him in Westminster on April 17, 2013, Ms. Madera said. Before the move, she lived in Zapata’s condo in Peru and carried on her affair with Mr. Saavedra.
In 2014, Ms. Vasquez-Collazos was diagnosed with cervical cancer and underwent surgery at the end of April, Ms. Madera said. Mr. Saavedra flew to the U.S. and got a hotel room in Santa Ana near the University of California–Irvine Medical Center, where Ms. Vasquez-Collazos was being treated, Ms. Madera said.
“There’s only one thing standing in the way of these lovers—the victim, Adrian Zapata,” Ms. Madera said in her opening statement of the trial.
Zapata loved his wife, but, “It’s a very one-sided love story,” Ms. Madera said.
Ms. Vasquez-Collazos was disappointed that her husband was not as wealthy as she assumed, so he worked longer hours and bought her a car, Ms. Madera said.
“He starts to work more, he’s stressed, he’s drinking more, smoking more,” Ms. Madera said.
Then Zapata grows suspicious that his wife is having an affair, Ms. Madera said.
Mr. Saavedra and Ms. Vasquez-Collazos had been sending affectionate and at times explicit messages to each other through Skype and Facebook, and, “She told her son, Renzo, about the possibility of moving somewhere else,” Ms. Madera said.
Zapata found a secret Facebook page that included photos of his wife with Mr. Saavedra, Ms. Madera said. At one point, Zapata called Mr. Saavedra and confronted him about the affair.
The defendants “conspired to murder him so they can be together, that’s the main priority,” Ms. Madera said.
But the “bonus” was getting the victim’s condo in Peru, an insurance policy, and money from a 401K fund, which had “modest” value, Ms. Madera said.
Much of the evidence in the case focused on the tracking of “secret” cell phones the two used, Ms. Madera said.
Ms. Vasquez-Collazos “set up an alibi” for her as she went to the university’s medical center on the day of the killing to get a note about her medical condition to give to her employer, and then went to a grocery store before she returned home to find the body, Ms. Madera said. She gave Mr. Saavedra a house key, and there were no signs of a break-in at the house, Ms. Madera alleged.
Zapata sustained two blows to the back of his head, fracturing his skull, and was stabbed four times in the neck and three in the shoulder, Madera said.
Mr. Saavedra was accused of “staging the scene to look like a robbery,” with various items thrown around, but valuables such as a TV were not taken, Ms. Madera said.
For the next five days, Mr. Saavedra and Ms. Vasquez-Collazos did not communicate on the phone or through messages, Ms. Madera said. But six days after the killing, the two checked into the same hotel in separate rooms, but Ms. Vasquez-Collazos went over to stay the night with Mr. Saavedra, prompting one of her sons to look for her, Ms. Madera said.
Mr. Saavedra’s attorney, Shannon Winston of the Orange County Public Defender’s Office, told jurors, “The evidence is going to show my client had nothing to do with the murder of Adrian Zapata.”
Ms. Winston said her client did not have any motive to kill Zapata because he was continuing his affair with Ms. Vasquez-Collazos unimpeded. The two could have gotten married before she met Zapata but did not, Ms. Winston said.
“He didn’t need to murder her husband,” Ms. Winston said.
Mr. Saavedra made no attempts to conceal his relationship with Ms. Vasquez-Collazos, Ms. Winston said. He introduced her to his friend as his girlfriend, the attorney said.
“So he’s not trying to cover anything up,” Ms. Winston said. “In no way is he trying to keep the relationship a secret.”
