A bill that would allow Louisiana residents to sue social media companies for deleting or limiting religious or political speech has failed to advance in the state Senate.
Under the proposal, users don’t have a cause of action when a social media company takes actions against hate speech, calls for violence, obscene or pornographic content, or operational errors.
Republicans and conservatives across the nation are championing legal measures to combat what they see as unfair moderation and censorship of conservative speech on social media. This comes after multiple Big Tech companies such as Facebook and Twitter increased policing of user speech, in particular during the lead-up to the 2020 election and following the Jan. 6 breach of the U.S. Capitol.
Former President Donald Trump’s accounts have been permanently suspended on Twitter and banned on Facebook because the social media companies decided that Trump’s posts violated their content standards.
The Louisiana bill, introduced by Sen. Jay Morris (R-West Monroe), advanced to a Senate committee last week.
Chris Sevier, a supporter of the bill and a lawyer, provided testimony at the hearing, arguing that Morris’s bill was the solution to perceived censorship by social media companies. He argued that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a federal statute, allows for states to create laws to defeat an immunity defense, commonly referred to as the Section 230 immunity defense, which provides social media companies that don’t act as publishers with a shield from civil action.
Morris didn’t immediately respond to a request by The Epoch Times for comment.
Opponents of the bill argue that the measure is unconstitutional and violates federal law. Eric Peterson, the director of the Pelican Center for Technology and Innovation, argued in the committee hearing that the bill isn’t a targeted solution to deal with the issue of censorship but instead would create a slew of problems for Louisiana.
He argued that websites that were not intended to be targeted by this bill such as eBay, Amazon, and Spotify may also be caught in the language of the proposed law.