Trump’s Election Case Trial Likely to Be Postponed, Legal Experts Say

The federal judge will likely push back the date due to multiple reasons, analysts have said.
Trump’s Election Case Trial Likely to Be Postponed, Legal Experts Say
Former President Donald Trump arrives at Trump Tower in New York, on Aug. 9, 2022. David Delgado/Reuters
Jack Phillips
Updated:

Several legal experts have stated that the federal judge in former President Donald Trump’s election-related case is likely to postpone his trial, currently scheduled for March, following several recent orders.

Earlier in January, Judge Tanya Chutkan seemed to suggest that the trial date for President Trump could be pushed back. The suggestion came in an order denying Jack Smith, the special counsel overseeing the case, permission to file any new major motions to advance the case. The reason, she wrote, is that the former president is currently appealing his case on the grounds of presidential immunity, a move that paused the case in December

Weeks later, the federal judge, based in Washington, scheduled the trial for a Jan. 6, 2021, defendant to begin on April 2. The date is just over three weeks before the scheduled start of President Trump’s trial. Prosecutors have said that the trial will likely last at least four weeks.

It’s not clear when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit will render a decision on President Trump’s claims of presidential immunity. A three-judge panel on the circuit held a court hearing to hear arguments in the case.

Analysts Doubtful

Lawyer and legal analyst Lisa Rubin wrote that Judge Chutkan might delay President Trump’s trial due to the scheduled April 2 trial date for the Jan. 6 defendant.
“This is the second time in a week that Chutkan has dropped breadcrumbs about the expected timing of Trump’s federal election interference case,” Ms. Rubin wrote on X (formerly Twitter) late last week. “But in the end, the biggest factor in her timing is the resolution of an appeal not within her control.”

With this new trial scheduling, former federal prosecutor Joyce Vance wrote on her Substack page that “the clock continues to tick, making it all but impossible for Judge Chutkan’s March 5 trial date in the Special Counsel’s January 6 prosecution to hold up.”

Another former prosecutor, Jordan Rubin, wrote that “some observers are eager for a ruling as soon as possible to avoid further delay of Trump’s federal election interference trial,” but the “judges’ greatest concern” is not “whether the opinion takes weeks instead of days.”

“There’s also the possibility that even if all three judges on the [appeals court] panel conclude that Trump isn’t immune, they might have different rationales and may think that certain issues deserve more analysis than others,” he added. “If they can’t incorporate those views into a single opinion, then a judge who agrees on the bottom line but for different reasons might write a concurring opinion that explains their separate views.”

Mr. Rubin added: “It’s possible that after a judge initially indicated they wanted to take a separate view, the panel is taking time to synthesize any disagreement into a single, coherent opinion.”

Speaking to Newsweek this month, Neama Rahmani, head of West Coast Trial Lawyers and a former federal prosecutor, stated that a March 4 trial date is highly unlikely. She added that, as the appeals process plays out, there is a chance that President Trump’s Jan. 6 trial won’t happen before the November 2024 election.

“That process will take months, and unless Judge Chutkan lifts the stay, there is a possibility that Trump’s trial does not happen before the November election. The other trial scheduled in April is a reflection of that reality,” she told Newsweek.

(Left) Special counsel Jack Smith. (Center) U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan. (Right) Former President Donald Trump. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images; Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts via AP; Brandon Bell/Getty Images)
(Left) Special counsel Jack Smith. (Center) U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan. (Right) Former President Donald Trump. Drew Angerer/Getty Images; Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts via AP; Brandon Bell/Getty Images

Other Details

Earlier this month, the judge had clarified that the March 4 trial date, which was set in August 2023, was designed to give both President Trump’s team and the special counsel’s prosecutors more time to prepare for the case.

Ultimately, her court adopted President Trump’s lawyers’ recommendation to prevent the parties from filing “any further substantive pretrial motions without first seeking leave from the court,” which means the case cannot proceed. The defendant also “forfeits no arguments or rights by choosing not to respond at this time,” she wrote.

“Diligent defense counsel will need to conduct a preliminary review of each substantive motion the government files in order to know whether they need to take further action,” wrote Judge Chutkan, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, this month. “While that is not a major burden, it is a cognizable one.”

In her court orders, Judge Chutkan has not specifically stated that she would postpone the trial. However, she has written that if the case is returned to her jurisdiction, she will consider adjusting the scheduling dates accordingly, including the currently set trial date of March 4.

Meanwhile, a case to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court may result in the dismissal of two out of four charges against President Trump. A defendant charged with obstruction of an official proceeding in connection with the Jan. 6 incident has appealed his charges. President Trump faces two counts under that same obstruction statute.

Jack Phillips
Jack Phillips
Breaking News Reporter
Jack Phillips is a breaking news reporter who covers a range of topics, including politics, U.S., and health news. A father of two, Jack grew up in California's Central Valley. Follow him on X: https://twitter.com/jackphillips5
twitter
Related Topics