LOS ANGELES—The signatures collected by the recall campaign against Los Angeles City Councilman Mike Bonin, whose district includes Venice Beach and West Los Angeles, are expected to be verified on Jan. 18.
Venice Beach residents Nico Ruderman and Katrina Schmitt initiated the recall campaign in June and last November submitted 39,188 signatures—well over 27,400, the number required to trigger a recall election.
Bonin was elected to District 11’s council seat in 2014 and reelected in 2017 by winning 71 percent of the vote. During his election campaign, Bonin promised to address crime, safety, and homelessness in the district.
In 2020, the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority reported more than 3,200 homeless people living on the streets in Bonin’s district—up from the previous year’s 2,339 unhoused.
Bonin also vowed to crack down on violent crime and increase police patrol during both his 2014 and 2017 election campaigns, and his increasing bike police presence on the Venice boardwalk in 2014 was a part of the effort.
However, in 2020, Bonin changed his tune when he voted to cut the city’s police funding by $150 million.
“Under Mike Bonin’s watch, the humanitarian crisis of the homeless population is growing exponentially. Tax-payer money is squandered. Fires. Struggling local businesses. Crime is rampant and rising. Neighborhoods and schools are unsafe. We feel afraid to visit public beaches and community parks,” the recall campaign’s website stated. “After seven years of this self-serving incumbent career politician, we have had enough, and we can’t wait any longer.”
“It’s a choice between housing and services, which work, or criminalization, which fails,” Bonin tweeted. “If the recall succeeds, it will empower those who think homelessness can be solved with handcuffs, something our city has tried and failed at for decades. We risk giving up on an evidence-based approach of housing and services, which began in earnest in just the past few years.”
Though the city’s ordinance 41.18 prohibits encampments in public “sensitive-use” areas such as schools and parks, enforcement of the ban in a district requires a motion to be introduced by a district councilmember and approved by the council.