The estate of Jeffrey Epstein has agreed to pay the U.S. Virgin Islands government $105 million and half of the proceeds from the sale of his Little St. James private island to settle criminal, sex trafficking, and child exploitation legal action.
Virgin Islands Attorney General Denise George said the settlement resolves the legal action her office took in 2020 against Epstein’s estate, co-defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn—co-executors of the estate—and ten Epstein-created entities.
The legal action was taken under the Virgin Islands’ anti-criminal enterprise, anti-sex trafficking, anti-child exploitation, and anti-fraud laws, resulting in the largest settlement in the history of the Virgin Islands.
George filed the legal action under the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (CICO), the Virgin Islands’ equivalent of the United States’ Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) laws.
George said CICO gave her the power to bring civil enforcement actions against Epstein’s estate and the co-defendants, which included the forfeiture of their assets and the imposition of civil penalties and damages, consistent with the law’s purpose to curtail their criminal activity and economic and political power in the Virgin Islands.
“That is our solemn responsibility as a government, separate and independent of any claims filed by individual survivors,” the attorney general said.
Sale of Epstein’s Islands
The final settlement amount will be decided within a year of the sale of the islands, according to George.Epstein’s estate also agreed to pay $450,000 to remedy the effects from razing the remnants of centuries-old historical structures of enslaved workers to make way for his development on Great St. James, another Epstein-owned island.
“Through this lawsuit and settlement, the Attorney General’s Office, acting on behalf of the Government, is using its authority to enforce the laws of the Virgin Islands against criminal enterprises and to protect public safety.”
The estate, executors, and other defendants did not admit any wrongdoing in reaching a settlement, according to Epstein estate lawyer Daniel Weiner, who said the settlement was in the best interest of the estate, victims, and creditors “to avoid the time, expense, and inherent uncertainties of protracted litigation.”