The deadly suicide attack that killed four Americans, including two U.S. service members, in Syria on Jan. 16, comes about two weeks after new House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.) abolished a key subcommittee on terrorism. The ISIS terrorist group claimed responsibility for the attack.
Engel’s first official act as chairman on Jan. 3, when Democrats officially regained the House majority, was replacing the terrorism subcommittee with one focused on investigating President Donald Trump.
Engel justified the move because “there wasn’t a great clamor” to continue the terrorism panel, formerly known officially as the Subcommittee on Terrorism, Proliferation, and Trade. It was one of the panel’s busiest subcommittees under Engel’s predecessor, Rep. Ed Royce (R-Calif.).
Engel characterized investigating Trump as “indispensable to the foreign-policy concerns of the day,” including what he called the president’s “hard-to-fathom Russia tilt” and Trump relatives’ “pursuit of business deals” in the Middle East.
Engel’s committee spokesman, Tim Mulvey, was unavailable for comment early Jan. 16, but analysts told The Epoch Times the ISIS attack demonstrates anew that the terrorist threat to the United States remains real.
Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), the committee’s ranking minority member, said: “today’s deadly bombing targeting our troops in Syria is a reminder that ISIS still has the capacity to carry out attacks.” He also urged Trump not to remove U.S. troops from Syria, as the president recently decided to do.
McCaul has also “strongly urged” Engel to reconsider the terrorism subcommittee decision, according to a senior congressional aide who asked not to be identified.
Other terrorism experts also urged Engel to rethink the action.
“It kind of plays into a fear I already had, which was that because this territory has been taken back from ISIS in Syria and because we haven’t had a kind of catastrophic attack in the West since Barcelona in 2017 is that we think all of a sudden that we don’t need to pay as much attention to it, that we can move on,” Robin Simcox told The Epoch Times. Simcox is the Margaret Thatcher Fellow at the Heritage Foundation’s Davis Institute on National Security and Foreign Policy. He specializes in terrorism and national-security issues.
Simcox questioned the wisdom of Engel’s decision, saying “one thing we can say we’ve not had a lack of in D.C. in the last couple of years is a focus on Trump and his connections to Russia … it’s a topic almost of national obsession. The idea that we should focus more on that seems to me odd, to say the least.”
The Heritage analyst pointed to the Syria attack as evidence that ISIS and al Qaeda, the radical Islamic terrorist group behind the Sept. 11 attacks in 2001, “are still going to be a great concern to us for many years to come. The ideology that animates these terrorist groups is going to be a great concern and now is not the time for more domestic navel-gazing.”
Committees like the terrorism subcommittee exist because a conversation is needed on “what does the terrorism threat look like in one year’s time, in five years time, in 10 years time and how do we need to prepare for that,” Simcox continued.
“No jihad terror attacks, or even a proliferation of jihad terror attacks, will convince Eliot Engel and his ilk that jihad terror is a problem that must be addressed,” Spencer said.
The foreign affairs chairman, like other Democratic leaders, Spencer said, “is focused mono-maniacally on destroying Trump. Every other issue must take a back seat to that.”
