Iowa’s Legislature passed a bill on Feb. 27 to remove gender identity protections from the state’s civil rights code, prompting protests at the state Capitol from opponents who say it could expose people who identify as transgender to discrimination.
Less than an hour later, House lawmakers voted 60–36 to approve the legislation, with five Republicans joining 31 Democrats in opposition.
It would also explicitly define female and male in terms of the reproductive system a person has or will have “through the course of normal development,” while “sex” would mean “the state of being either male or female as observed or clinically verified at birth.”
Elsewhere under the bill, “gender” would be considered a synonym for sex and “shall not be considered a synonym or shorthand expression for gender identity, experienced gender, gender expression, or gender role.”
Gender identity was added to the civil rights code in Iowa in 2007 when Democrats controlled the Legislature.
Gov. Kim Reynolds is widely expected to sign the new GOP-backed measure into law, which would go into effect on July 1, making Iowa the first state to undo explicit non-discrimination protections based on gender identity.
Supporters of the bill say it is needed to preserve women’s rights and to protect them, particularly in places such as bathrooms and locker rooms, and while participating in sports.
State Capitol Protests
Hundreds of LGBT advocates streamed into the Capitol rotunda on Feb. 27 to protest the bill, some of them waving signs reading “Trans rights are human rights” and chanting slogans including “No hate in our state!”There was a heavy police presence, with state troopers stationed around the rotunda.
Rep. Aime Wichtendahl, a Democrat, condemned the measure in comments delivered from the House floor.
“The purpose of this bill, and the purpose of every anti-trans bill, is to further erase us from public life and to stigmatize our existence,” the lawmaker said to colleagues. “The sum total of every anti-trans bill and anti-LGBTQ bill is to make our existence illegal, to force us back into the closet. If we want jobs or a place to live, we have to go back, is what they are telling us.”
The administration is currently facing multiple lawsuits over the orders.