House Republicans Want Answers From State Department About Suspended Iran Envoy Robert Malley

House Republicans, including Michael McCaul and Brian Mast, are demanding transparency from the state department regarding the suspension of Special Envoy for Iran Robert Malley’s security clearance.
House Republicans Want Answers From State Department About Suspended Iran Envoy Robert Malley
Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas) makes a point to delegates during the evening session of the Republican National Convention at the Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland, Ohio on July 18, 2016. Dominick Reuter/AFP via Getty Images
Savannah Hulsey Pointer
Updated:
0:00

House Republicans sent a request to the State Department for information about the suspension of an administration official involved in relations between the United States and Iran.

The House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul (R-Texas) and Subcommittee on Oversight and Accountability Chairman Brian Mast (R-Fla.) reiterated previous requests from June 30 and July 13  to Secretary of State Antony Blinken for regular updates on the investigation into the suspension of Special Envoy for Iran Robert Malley’s security clearance in an Aug. 18 letter addressed to the Department of State.

Mr. McCaul sent his first letter on the matter to Mr. Blinken, demanding additional details following reports Mr. Malley’s security clearance was suspended amid an investigation into his potential mishandling of classified documents.

In a closed briefing held on July 28th, John Bass, Under Secretary of State for Management, and Gentry Smith, Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security, provided insight into the circumstances surrounding Mr. Malley’s security clearance suspension.

However, the committee stated that they still have concerns about the department’s lack of timely communication with Congress.

“Accordingly, we are writing to directly reiterate our request that the department notify and brief the committee upon any relevant developments regarding the status of Mr. Malley’s employment and his ability to access classified information at the department,” the lawmakers said.

The committee expressed bipartisan interest in receiving testimony or a briefing from Mr. Malley on Iran policy.

Despite this, it was discovered that some officials, including Mr. Blinken, were aware of Mr. Malley’s situation and lack of security clearance for several months but did not communicate this information to Congress.

In response to the department’s initial promise to consider the committee’s request for regular updates, the congressmen stated that they are unsatisfied with the state department’s actions, citing the need for greater transparency and accountability on the issue.

The committees have directly restated their demand that the department keep them informed about any relevant developments concerning Mr. Malley’s employment status and his access to classified information.

The committee members asserted that their request was particularly pertinent due to recent news that Mr. Malley will be taking on new roles as a visiting professor at Princeton University’s School of Public and International Affairs and as a senior fellow at Yale’s Jackson School of Global Affairs.

According to the lawmakers, these developments suggest a potential change in Mr. Malley’s employment status and his impending departure from the state department.

The committee has extended its call for improved communication and transparency between the department and Congress, requesting that the department notify and brief the committee in a timely manner when a high-ranking official’s security clearance is suspended or revoked.

Acknowledging Mr. Blinken’s commitment to transparency, the committee stated that they anticipate continued engagement on this “troubling matter.”

Mr. McCaul has a history of holding Mr. Blinkin accountable, subpoenaing multiple documents from the state department regarding the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan, and even threatening to hold Mr. Blinkin in contempt of Congress in May of this year, if he did not comply with the committee requests.
Since that time, the committee has issued requests for several documents and on Aug. 10, sent a letter to Mr. Blinken’s department, asserting that “the department has failed to comply with the committee’s subpoena, producing only 16 distinct documents.”

In the letter, Mr. McCaul asserted that: “The department’s anemic subpoena response suggests that it is either deliberately obstructing the committee’s oversight, or that its document retention, location, and production procedures are astoundingly deficient. Neither is acceptable.”

The Department of State did not immediately respond to The Epoch Times’ request for comment.