House Republicans Receptive to US Talks With Iran

‘Trump isn’t going to get taken advantage of here. I see no problem with talks just like I saw no problem with talks with Russia,’ Rep. Dan Crenshaw said.
House Republicans Receptive to US Talks With Iran
An Iranian flag at Iran's Bushehr nuclear power plant during an official ceremony to kickstart work on a second reactor at Iran's only nuclear power station on Nov. 10, 2019. Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty Images
Jackson Richman
Arjun Singh
Updated:
0:00

In interviews with The Epoch Times, congressional Republicans said they favored the Trump administration negotiating with Iran.

The United States will hold indirect talks with Iran on April 12 despite President Donald Trump saying on April 7 that there would be direct negotiations with the regime.

Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas), an Iran hawk, called the talks a “smart” idea.

“This is not the Obama era, where they’re looking for a deal so bad that they’re gonna get a bad deal,” he said.

The Obama administration reached a deal with Iran in 2015 in which Tehran agreed to scale back its nuclear weapons program in exchange for sanctions relief.

Critics said the deal didn’t stop the nuclear program and that the sanctions relief went to the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. They also noted that the deal did not address Iran’s other malign activities, from backing terrorist groups such as Hamas to its ballistic missile program.

In 2018, Trump withdrew from the 2015 accord, reimposing sanctions and enacting new ones in what his administration dubbed a “maximum pressure” campaign.

“Trump isn’t going to get taken advantage of here. I see no problem with talks just like I saw no problem with talks with Russia,” said Crenshaw, referring to U.S. efforts to achieve a cease-fire between Russia and Ukraine.

“You got to try.”

Rep. Rich McCormick (R-Ga.) said the onus is on Iran to agree to a deal.

“If they’re going to continue their terrorist weapon distribution around the Middle East that’s used against American lives, American ships, American troops, if you’re going to disseminate to Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, if you’re going to continue to give weapons to all of our enemies around the world, you got a problem with us. You’re my enemy,” he said.

McCormick said the United States should threaten military action against Iran if the regime does not change its behavior and that the United States needs to stand firm during negotiations with Tehran.

“We can’t treat them like friends,” he said. “Now maybe we can negotiate with them because they respect strength. But they’re not going to respect us just because we give them something.”

Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-Wis.) also said the talks should occur.

“You only come to peace if you can speak to somebody. We don’t want to go to war with the Iranian people,” he said.

Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) said the United States needs to “play hardball” and make it clear to Iran that it cannot have a nuclear weapon.

Iran has stated that it is not interested in direct talks with the United States.

“Our main goal in the talks is naturally restoring rights of people as well as lifting sanctions,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told Iranian state media.

“And if the other side has a real will, this is achievable, and it has no relation to the method, either direct or indirect. For the time being, indirect is our preference. And we have no plan to alter it to direct.”

Morgan Ortagus, Trump’s deputy Middle East special envoy, said the window for talks with Iran is not indefinite.

“If we’re going to have talks, they need to be quick,” she told Al Arabiya.

“They need to be serious about dismantling their nuclear weapons program.”

The Biden administration held indirect talks with Iran in an effort to get the United States back into the 2015 nuclear deal. The negotiations fell apart in 2022 after more than a year.
The Trump administration on April 9 announced sanctions on five individuals and five entities that support Iran’s nuclear program.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Jackson Richman is a Washington correspondent for The Epoch Times. In addition to Washington politics, he covers the intersection of politics and sports/sports and culture. He previously was a writer at Mediaite and Washington correspondent at Jewish News Syndicate. His writing has also appeared in The Washington Examiner. He is an alum of George Washington University.
twitter