House Republicans blocked on April 9 an effort by Democrats to force a vote on halting the reciprocal tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump, which are currently paused for three months.
The maneuver was done through a rule, which the House must vote on to advance to votes on measures.
The House Rules Committee advanced the rule 9–3 on April 9, which mainly deals with the unrelated budget resolution to unlock the reconciliation process to pass Trump’s signature legislative agenda. The rule punts the vote on the resolution to September.
The resolution was introduced by Reps. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), Rick Larsen (D-Wash.), and Richard Neal (D-Mass.). It has an additional 23 co-sponsors.
“By implementing these tariffs, Trump has now imposed the largest and most regressive tax in modern history, sent the stock market into its worst plunge since COVID, and is risking a global recession,” they said in a statement. “These tariffs are nothing more than a sales tax on American families, driving up prices on everything from groceries to cars.”
Disapproval resolutions force a vote in the House and Senate, where a simple majority is needed for passage as opposed to being subject to the 60-vote filibuster threshold.
Trump announced on April 9 a 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs for dozens of countries and retained a baseline 10 percent tariff for all countries, except China.
The president increased tariffs to 125 percent on China, after Beijing announced 85 percent retaliatory tariffs on the United States.
The president said he paused most reciprocal tariffs because more than 75 countries have reached out to the administration requesting trade negotiations.
Congressional Republicans have largely expressed support for Trump’s tariffs.
Rep. August Pfluger (R-Texas) told reporters that the president is “making good on a campaign promise to shake things up, to reorder the world system, whether it’s trade or whether it’s alliances or military organizations.”
Rep. Rich McCormick (R-Ga.) told reporters that the tariffs finally put China on notice.
“If China needs our market more than we need their market, because they already put unfair tariffs and regulations and restrictions on us, they’re going to suffer way more from this than we are in a trade war,” he said.
“If the rest of the world’s going to come to the table, why shouldn’t China too?”