Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is among several Republican lawmakers to call for a more detailed justification of President Donald Trump’s firing of the State Department’s inspector general.
A White House official said on May 16 that the decision to oust Linick was prompted by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo himself. “Secretary Pompeo recommended the move, and President Trump agreed,” the official said.
Linick is expected to serve for several more weeks as, by law, the administration must give Congress 30 days’ notice of plans to dismiss an inspector general.
“The President has not provided the kind of justification for the removal of IG Linick required by this law,” Collins wrote.
Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah, a vocal Trump critic, responded more broadly to the dismissal of Linick, who was the fourth watchdog axed in the last three months.
“The firings of multiple Inspectors General is unprecedented; doing so without good cause chills the independence essential to their purpose,” Romney wrote in a tweet. “It is a threat to accountable democracy and a fissure in the constitutional balance of power.”
Defending the president’s actions was senior adviser Peter Navarro, who on Sunday said Trump “clearly has the legal authority” to remove Linick.
“There’s a bureaucracy out there. There’s a lot of people in that bureaucracy who think that they got elected president and not Donald J. Trump,” he told ABC in an interview.
“Some people call it the deep state. I think that’s apt,” Navarro said, adding, “There’s always going to be somebody better to replace them, somebody more loyal—not to the president necessarily—but to the Trump agenda.”
“So, I don’t mourn the loss of people when they leave this bureaucracy,” he added.
In his call for justification of Linick’s dismissal, Grassley said that while he objected to how the watchdog handled the inquiry into the role the State Department played in the controversial Trump-Russia collusion probe, he said the important role inspectors general play in American democracy demands a detailed explanation in case of firing.
“Here again, inspectors general are crucial in correcting government failures and promoting the accountability that the American people deserve,” Grassley said. “Although he failed to fully evaluate the State Department’s role in advancing the debunked Russian collusion investigation, those shortcomings do not waive the President’s responsibility to provide details to Congress when removing an IG.”