The case built by Democrats running the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump currently rests entirely on secondhand evidence, assumptions, and speculation, according to a report released by House Republicans on Dec. 2.
Republicans assess that the Democrats have so far failed to substantiate the allegation at the core of the impeachment inquiry: that Trump sought to boost his reelection chances by pressuring Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, a potential political rival.
While Democrats assert that the allegation has been proven, during the past several weeks, no witness has offered firsthand evidence of Trump exerting pressure or conditioning any official act on Ukraine’s compliance with his request.
“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,” the report stated.
“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump covered up the summary of his phone conversation with President Zelensky. The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump obstructed the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.”
House Republicans have long denounced the impeachment probe as an attempt by Democrats to undo the outcome of the 2016 election. The report—prepared by Republican staff for Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), and Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas)—reasserts this claim.
“The Democrats’ impeachment inquiry, led by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, is merely the outgrowth of their obsession with re-litigating the results of the 2016 presidential election,” the report stated. “The evidence does not establish any impeachable offense.”
Democrats say impeachment is the only constitutional tool designed to counter corruption by an elected official. Some have suggested that direct evidence is lacking because the Trump administration has refused to comply with subpoenas for documents while some of the key witnesses—including the president, his personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, and former Energy Secretary Rick Perry—have refused to testify.
“Evidence of Trump’s obstruction of Congress is overwhelming,” Schiff wrote, without offering evidence. “If we allow it to succeed, it will mean future presidents can simply ignore Congressional subpoenas & oversight, Fundamentally altering the balance of power and paving the way for unchecked corruption and malfeasance.”
The Republican report counters the obstruction charge by suggesting that the White House is within its rights to assert executive privilege, especially amid a hyperpartisan impeachment process in which the president hasn’t been granted due process to defend himself. Schiff conducted closed-door impeachment hearings for nearly a month before the full House of Representatives authorized the inquiry in a party-line vote.
“President Trump’s assertion of longstanding claims of executive privilege is a legitimate response to an unfair, abusive, and partisan process, and does not constitute obstruction of a legitimate impeachment inquiry,” the report stated.
In addition to the central allegation that Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate Biden, Democrats claim the president withheld aid to Ukraine and dangled the prospect of a White House meeting as leverage to force Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to comply with his request. Both Trump and Zelensky have repeatedly said there was no quid pro quo or pressure.
The report points to witness testimony that suggests Trump was skeptical about Ukraine due to its history of corruption long before he ordered a hold on security aid. The Republicans also argue that Trump had a valid concern about Hunter Biden’s role on the board of Ukrainian gas company Burisma Holdings while his father, Joe Biden, served as the vice president of the United States.
Trump brought up Hunter Biden during the July 25 call with Zelensky, which is now at the core of the impeachment inquiry. Trump asked Zelensky to “look into” the firing of Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin.
In early February 2016, Shokin’s office seized the assets of Mykola Zlochevsky, the owner of Burisma. At the time, Hunter Biden had held a paid position on the board of Burisma for nearly two years. Weeks later, Shokin was forced to submit his resignation.
Joe Biden has bragged about forcing Shokin’s ouster by withholding $1 billion in loan guarantees from Ukraine. State Department official George Kent testified that he flagged his concerns about Biden’s role in Burisma in early 2015.
In addition to assessing that the evidence collected so far doesn’t substantiate key claims by Democrats, the Republican report also underlines the lack of evidence behind some of the secondary claims put forth by Democrats.
The Republicans concluded there is no evidence to establish that the president orchestrated a so-called “irregular channel” to implement Ukraine policy. The three officials who were part of the alleged “irregular channel”—Ambassador Gordon Sondland, Special Envoy Kurt Volker, and Secretary Perry—all had official responsibilities tied to Ukraine and reported regularly to the National Security Council and the State Department, the report stated.
The report also noted witness testimony that contradicted a claim in the anonymous whistleblower complaint that triggered the impeachment inquiry. The complaint stated that the White House sought to fence off the transcript of the Trump–Zelensky call, in a bid to shield the president, by moving the document to a classified system. But Tim Morrison, an adviser to the president, testified that the move to the classified system was the result of an administrative mistake.
“At the heart of the matter, the impeachment inquiry involves the actions of only two people: President Trump and President Zelensky,” the report stated. “The summary of their July 25, 2019, telephone conversation shows no quid pro quo or indication of conditionality, threats, or pressure—much less evidence of bribery or extortion.”
