FTC Orders Avast to Pay £16.5 Million, Bans Firm from Selling Browsing Data

‘Avast promised users that its products would protect the privacy of their browsing data but delivered the opposite,’ FTC’s Samuel Levine said.
FTC Orders Avast to Pay £16.5 Million, Bans Firm from Selling Browsing Data
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) building in Washington, D.C. (Paul J. Richards/AFP via Getty Images)
Katabella Roberts
6/28/2024
Updated:
6/29/2024
0:00

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has ordered British firm Avast to pay $16.5 million and banned the company from selling, disclosing, or licensing web browsing data for advertising purposes, the agency announced on June 27.

In a press release, the commission voted 3-2 to approve the order which it said is meant to “provide redress to consumers.”

As part of the order, the cybersecurity software provider and its subsidiaries must delete web browsing information transferred to its Czech subsidiary and any products or algorithms derived from that data.

It must also obtain consent from consumers before selling or licensing browsing data from non-Avast products to third parties for advertising, and tell them if their browsing information was sold to third parties without their consent. The company also has to implement a “comprehensive privacy program” to address its misconduct as alleged by the FTC.

The ban stems from a complaint filed by the FTC in February alleging the UK-based Avast Limited, via Czech subsidiary Jumpshot, unfairly collected and sold consumers’ browsing information to more than 100 third parties, despite promising that its products would protect consumers from online tracking.

Avast, which bills itself as a protector of “digital freedom for everyone” is one of several brands owned by Gen Digital, a multinational software company headquartered in Tempe, Arizona, and Prague in the Czech Republic.
Lawyers for the FTC claimed the software company collected user data through its browser extensions and antivirus software, stored it indefinitely, and sold it without adequate notice or consumer consent. The complaint alleges Avast, through its Czech subsidiary, engaged in such behavior since at least 2014.

The FTC further claimed that the firm deceived customers by claiming the software would protect their privacy by blocking third-party tracking only to then allegedly sell their detailed, re-identifiable browsing data.

“Avast promised users that its products would protect the privacy of their browsing data but delivered the opposite,” said Samuel Levine, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection in a statement when the lawsuit was announced. “Avast’s bait-and-switch surveillance tactics compromised consumers’ privacy and broke the law.”

Avast announced in January 2020 that Jumpshot would cease operating.

In a statement at the time, the company said it remained committed to keeping users safe online.

“The bottom line is that any practices that jeopardize user trust are unacceptable to Avast,” said Avast CEO Ondrej Vlcek. “We are vigilant about our users’ privacy, and we took quick action to begin winding down Jumpshot’s operations after it became evident that some users questioned the alignment of data provision to Jumpshot with our mission and principles that define us as a Company.”

In an email statement to The Epoch Times, an Avast spokesperson said the company reached a settlement with the FTC in February 2024 to resolve its investigation of the company’s past provision of customer data to its Jumpshot subsidiary, which Avast voluntarily closed in January 2020.

“This latest notice from the FTC is finalizing that settlement,” the spokesperson said. “We are pleased to resolve this matter and remain committed to our mission of protecting and empowering people’s digital lives.”

This report was updated with the FTC’s statement.
Katabella Roberts is a news writer for The Epoch Times, focusing primarily on the United States, world, and business news.